CVE Intelligence
Skip to main content
mediumRemote Code Execpublic exploit

CVE-2026-11737

CVE-2026-11737 — Some NETGEAR Nighthawk devices allow administrators to tamper with the device

Insufficient input validation vulnerability in the listed NETGEAR models allows authenticated administrators connected to the local network to make unauthorized modification to the device software and functionality.

Published Updated Sources: NVD, NETGEAR (CNA), GitHub, SOCRadar CTI

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.

Exploitation

Exploit code

public exploit, none observed

EPSS

0%

ahead of 0% of scored CVEs

Affects

NETGEAR

13 products listed

CVSS base

4.3

medium

Remediation

The vendor's own words where we have them.

Devices with automatic updates enabled may already have this patch applied. If not, please check the firmware version and update it to the latest. Fixed in: ProductFixed VersionRAX20 (EoS) 4-Stream AX1800 WiFi 6 Router V1.0.18.144 https://www.netgear.com/support/product/rax20/ RAX41 (EoS) Nighthawk AX5 5-Stream AX3600 WiFi Router V1.1.6.36 https://www.netgear.com/support/product/rax41/ RAX41v2 Nighthawk AX5 5-Stream AX3600 WiFi Router V1.1.6.36 https://www.netgear.com/support/product/rax41v2/ RAX42 (EoS) Nighthawk AX5 5-Stream AX4200 WiFi Router V1.1.6.36 https://www.netgear.com/support/produ…

First 24 hours

Ordered from the record's own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found.

  • Identify exposed assets running affected vendor/product/version combinations.
  • Prioritize based on EPSS, PoC availability, and external exposure.
  • Search available logs for exploit probes, errors, authentication anomalies, or suspicious child processes matching the vulnerability class.

Affected scope

Vendor, product and version as the advisories word them.

VendorProductVersionsStatus
NETGEARRAX200Vulnerable
NETGEARRAX410Vulnerable
NETGEARRAX41v20Vulnerable
NETGEARRAX420Vulnerable
NETGEARRAX42v20Vulnerable
NETGEARRAX430Vulnerable
NETGEARRAX43v20Vulnerable
NETGEARRAX450Vulnerable
NETGEARRAX49S0Vulnerable
NETGEARRAX500Vulnerable
NETGEARRAX50v20Vulnerable
NETGEARRAX54S0Vulnerable

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactSource
4.3CVSS 4.0medium——NETGEAR (CNA)

CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/AU:N/R:U/V:D/RE:L/U:Amber

What this weakness leads to

MITRE's own consequences and mitigations for the weakness class — the authority's wording, not guidance derived from the CVSS vector.

MITRE

CWE-20 · Improper Input Validation

  • DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart
  • DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU)
  • DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory)
  • Read Memory

Mitigation: Consider using language-theoretic security (LangSec) techniques that characterize inputs using a formal language and build recognizers for that language. This effectively requires parsing to be a distinct layer that effectively enforces a boundary between raw input and internal data representations, instead of allowing parser code to be scattered throughout the program, where it could be subject to errors or inconsistencies that create weaknesses. [REF-1109] [REF-1110] [REF-1111]

Weakness & attack patterns

  • CWE-20Improper Input Validation

Attack patterns reported against this CVE. The ATT&CK techniques below are inferred from its weakness class.

CAPEC-10 · Buffer Overflow via Environment VariablesCAPEC-101 · Server Side Include (SSI) InjectionCAPEC-104 · Cross Zone ScriptingCAPEC-108 · Command Line Execution through SQL InjectionCAPEC-109 · Object Relational Mapping InjectionCAPEC-110 · SQL Injection through SOAP Parameter TamperingCAPEC-120 · Double EncodingCAPEC-13 · Subverting Environment Variable ValuesCAPEC-135 · Format String InjectionCAPEC-136 · LDAP InjectionCAPEC-14 · Client-side Injection-induced Buffer OverflowCAPEC-153 · Input Data Manipulation
  • T1562.003Impair Defenses: Impair Command History Logging
  • T1574.006Hijack Execution Flow: Dynamic Linker Hijacking
  • T1574.007Hijack Execution Flow: Path Interception by PATH Environment Variable

Public exploit

Capability, not use: code existing is a different claim from anyone running it.

Repositories

3

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.

  • Monitor for scanner or exploit-pattern traffic after 3 public PoC repositories were reported.
EDR process telemetryhost service logs

Timeline

What happened to this CVE, newest first — with the readings a source repeats on a schedule counted underneath rather than listed.

  1. 2026
  2. Added · CVSS 3.1 4.3

    Aug 11, 2026 · NVD

  3. Initial · CVE published

    Aug 11, 2026 · NVD

References

11 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record1

What should defenders know first?

CVE-2026-11737 is Some NETGEAR Nighthawk devices allow administrators to tamper with the device, a medium vulnerability affecting RAX20, RAX41, RAX41v2, RAX42, RAX42v2, RAX43, RAX43v2, RAX45, RAX49S, RAX50, RAX50v2, RAX54S, RAX54Sv2 from NETGEAR. The current evidence does not list it in CISA KEV, and the exploit status is: Active exploitation is not confirmed from current sources for CVE-2026-11737. Public exploit evidence is: 3 public PoC repositories reported; 0 marked weaponized in current dataset. The affected-version evidence is listed in the key facts and affected products tables. Defenders should first verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run those versions, then apply vendor patches or mitigations, restrict reachable attack surface, and preserve logs for detection review. CVSS 4.3 describes technical severity, while EPSS 0% helps estimate near-term exploit likelihood; neither replaces asset context. Unknown fields should remain explicit in tickets, and threat actor, IOC, victimology, or payload claims should not be added unless a cited source supports them. Monitor CISA KEV, vendor advisories, NVD changes, public PoC repositories, and internal telemetry for update triggers.