CVE-2026-13226
CVE-2026-13226 — Groundhogg <= 4.5.4 - Authenticated (Custom+) SQL Injection via 'after' Parameter
The Groundhogg — CRM, Newsletters, and Marketing Automation plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to generic SQL Injection via the 'after' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 4.5.4 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack of sufficient preparation on the existing SQL query. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Sales Manager-level access and above, to append additional SQL queries into already existing queries that can be used to extract sensitive information from the database. The AJAX handler wp_ajax_groundhogg_get_contacts_table has its capability check commented out and performs no nonce verification, meaning any authenticated user regardless of role can reach the vulnerable code path.
Published Updated Sources: cvelistV5, Wordfence
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.
Exploitation
Unreported
no source claims exploitation
EPSS
0%
chance of exploitation in 30 days
CVSS base
6.5
MEDIUM
CISA SSVC assessment
Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.
Exploitation
None
none · proof-of-concept · active
Automatable
No
can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps
Technical impact
Partial
partial · total control of the vulnerable component
Affected scope
The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.
Vendors (1)
Products (1)
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.5 | CVSS 3.1 | MEDIUM | — | — | cvelistV5 |
Weakness & attack patterns
- CWE-89
References
8 on the record
- www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/f2ba40d9-2d37-453a-a731-078f1de1fc69?source=cve
reference
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/groundhogg/tags/4.5.4/includes/legacy-contact-query.php#L1013
reference
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/groundhogg/tags/4.5.4/includes/legacy-contact-query.php#L1017
reference
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/groundhogg/tags/4.5.4/admin/contacts/contacts-page.php#L766
reference
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/groundhogg/tags/4.5.4/admin/contacts/tables/contacts-table.php#L101
reference
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/groundhogg/tags/4.5.4/includes/contact-query.php#L2586
reference
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/groundhogg/tags/4.5.4/includes/functions.php#L679
reference
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?sfp_email=&sfph_mail=&reponame=&old=3585561%40groundhogg&new=3585561%40groundhogg&sfp_email=&sfph_mail=
reference
Elsewhere on this site
- trainingbusinessprosevery CVE for this vendor
- CWE-89other pages naming this weakness
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.