CVE Intelligence
Skip to main content
LOW

CVE-2026-14786

CVE-2026-14786 — radareorg radare2 str.c r_str_word_get0set integer overflow

A security flaw has been discovered in radareorg radare2 up to 6.1.6. This impacts the function r_str_word_get0set of the file libr/util/str.c. The manipulation results in integer overflow. The attack must be initiated from a local position. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The patch is identified as 11ac224c0eb8d57830fccc99e1c1cd8e5d958813. It is best practice to apply a patch to resolve this issue.

Published Updated Sources: cvelistV5, VulDB

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.

Exploitation

Unreported

no source claims exploitation

EPSS

0%

chance of exploitation in 30 days

Affects

radareorg

radare2

CVSS base

3.3

LOW

CISA SSVC assessment

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

CISA

Exploitation

PoC

none · proof-of-concept · active

Automatable

No

can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps

Technical impact

Partial

partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Affected scope

The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.

Vendors (1)

Products (1)

radare2

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactSource
3.3CVSS 3.1LOWcvelistV5

Weakness & attack patterns

  • CWE-190
  • CWE-189

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.

  • Search application, proxy, and WAF logs for requests touching /util/str.c.

References

7 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.