CVE Intelligence
Skip to main content
MEDIUM

CVE-2026-23792

CVE-2026-23792 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Intelligence

An issue was discovered in NR RRC in Samsung Mobile Processor and Modem Exynos 1080, 2100, 1280, 2200, 1330, 1380, 1480, 2400, 1580, 2500, W1000, Modem 5300, Modem 5400, and Modem 5410. Incorrect handling of unauthenticated downlink RRC Setup messages can cause the baseband to crash.

Published Updated Sources: cvelistV5, mitre

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.

Exploitation

Unreported

no source claims exploitation

EPSS

0%

chance of exploitation in 30 days

Affects

samsung

exynos_1080_firmware

CVSS base

4

MEDIUM

CISA SSVC assessment

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

CISA

Exploitation

None

none · proof-of-concept · active

Automatable

No

can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps

Technical impact

Partial

partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Affected scope

The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.

Vendors (1)

samsung

Products (1)

exynos 1080 firmware

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactSource
4CVSS 3.1MEDIUM——cvelistV5

Weakness & attack patterns

  • CWE-346

Attack patterns reported against this CVE. The ATT&CK techniques below are inferred from its weakness class.

  • T1557.002Adversary-in-the-Middle: ARP Cache Poisoning
  • T1584.002Compromise Infrastructure: DNS Server
  • T1134Access Token Manipulation

References

2 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

  • samsungevery CVE for this vendor
  • CWE-346other pages naming this weakness

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.