CVE-2026-23922
CVE-2026-23922 — Email media OAuth secret leak to Super Admin
The email media OAuth field 'Client secret' cannot be read after saving, but a Super Admin can leak it by setting a malicious 'Token endpoint'. Changes were made to reset the client secret upon changing the token endpoint.
Published Updated Sources: NVD, Zabbix (CNA), GitHub, SOCRadar CTI
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.
Exploitation
Exploit code
public exploit, none observed
EPSS
0%
ahead of 0% of scored CVEs
CVSS base
2.1
low
Remediation
The vendor's own words where we have them.
Update the affected components to their respective fixed versions.
First 24 hours
Ordered from the record's own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found.
- Identify exposed assets running affected vendor/product/version combinations.
- Prioritize based on EPSS, PoC availability, and external exposure.
- Search available logs for exploit probes, errors, authentication anomalies, or suspicious child processes matching the vulnerability class.
Affected scope
Vendor, product and version as the advisories word them.
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zabbix | Zabbix | 7.4.0 to <= 7.4.8 | Vulnerable |
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.1 | CVSS 4.0 | low | — | — | Zabbix (CNA) |
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
What this weakness leads to
MITRE's own consequences and mitigations for the weakness class — the authority's wording, not guidance derived from the CVSS vector.
CWE-522 · Insufficiently Protected Credentials
- Gain Privileges or Assume Identity
Mitigation: Use an appropriate security mechanism to protect the credentials.
Weakness & attack patterns
- CWE-522
Attack patterns reported against this CVE. The ATT&CK techniques below are inferred from its weakness class.
- T1552.004Unsecured Credentials: Private Keys
- T1558.003Steal or Forge Kerberos Tickets: Kerberoasting
- T1543Create or Modify System Process
Public exploit
Capability, not use: code existing is a different claim from anyone running it.
Repositories
1
Detection
Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.
- Monitor for scanner or exploit-pattern traffic after 1 public PoC repositories were reported.
Timeline
What happened to this CVE, newest first — with the readings a source repeats on a schedule counted underneath rather than listed.
- 2026
Added · CVSS 3.1 2.1
Aug 18, 2026 · NVD
Initial · CVE published
Aug 18, 2026 · NVD
References
1 on the record
- support.zabbix.com/browse/ZBX-28067
Vendor Advisory
Elsewhere on this site
- Zabbixevery CVE for this vendor
- Remote Code Execsame class
- CWE-522other pages naming this weakness
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record1
What should defenders know first?
CVE-2026-23922 is Email media OAuth secret leak to Super Admin, a low vulnerability affecting Zabbix from Zabbix. The current evidence does not list it in CISA KEV, and the exploit status is: Active exploitation is not confirmed from current sources for CVE-2026-23922. Public exploit evidence is: 1 public PoC repositories reported; 0 marked weaponized in current dataset. The affected-version evidence is listed in the key facts and affected products tables. Defenders should first verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run those versions, then apply vendor patches or mitigations, restrict reachable attack surface, and preserve logs for detection review. CVSS 2.1 describes technical severity, while EPSS 0% helps estimate near-term exploit likelihood; neither replaces asset context. Unknown fields should remain explicit in tickets, and threat actor, IOC, victimology, or payload claims should not be added unless a cited source supports them. Monitor CISA KEV, vendor advisories, NVD changes, public PoC repositories, and internal telemetry for update triggers.