CVE Intelligence
Skip to main content
MEDIUM

CVE-2026-33385

CVE-2026-33385 — Blind SQL Injection in Quick.CMS

A Blind SQL injection vulnerability has been identified in Quick.CMS. Improper neutralization of input provided by a high-privileged user into multiple fields in administration panel allows for Blind SQL Injection attacks. The vendor states that this administration panel already allows for significant modification capabilities. The SQL injection vulnerability primarily enables bypassing front-end validation controls and potential database destruction. Given the trust model in which this application is designed to be administered, remediation of this issue was not deemed necessary by the vendor. This vulnerability has been found in version 6.8, but other versions might also be vulnerable.

Published Updated Sources: cvelistV5, CERT-PL

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.

Exploitation

Unreported

no source claims exploitation

EPSS

0%

chance of exploitation in 30 days

Affects

opensolution

quick_cms

CVSS base

5.1

MEDIUM

CISA SSVC assessment

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

CISA

Exploitation

None

none · proof-of-concept · active

Automatable

No

can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps

Technical impact

Partial

partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Affected scope

The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.

Vendors (1)

Products (1)

quick cms

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactSource
5.1CVSS 4.0MEDIUM——cvelistV5

Weakness & attack patterns

  • CWE-89

References

2 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.