CVE Intelligence
Skip to main content
CISA KEVmediumInjectionpublic exploit

CVE-2026-42897

CVE-2026-42897 — Microsoft Exchange Server Spoofing Vulnerability

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Exchange Server allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

Published Updated Sources: NVD, Microsoft (CNA), CISA, FIRST EPSS, GitHub, GitHub Security Advisory

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.

Exploitation

Confirmed

CISA KEV, listed May 15, 2026

EPSS

70%

ahead of 99.3% of scored CVEs

Affects

Microsoft

4 products listed

CVSS base

6.1

medium · 3 sources

CISA SSVC assessment

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

CISA

Exploitation

Active

none · proof-of-concept · active

Automatable

No

can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps

Technical impact

Total

partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Remediation

The vendor's own words where we have them.

Upgrade Microsoft Exchange Server 2016 Cumulative Update 23 to a fixed release. Apply vendor patches per advisory and restrict external exposure of the affected component until patched.

CISA required action

Apply mitigations per vendor instructions, follow applicable BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud services, or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.

Federal deadline May 29, 2026 — passed 90 days ago

First 24 hours

Ordered from the record's own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found.

  • Identify exposed assets running affected vendor/product/version combinations.
  • Treat as emergency remediation because CISA KEV status is present.
  • Search available logs for exploit probes, errors, authentication anomalies, or suspicious child processes matching the vulnerability class.

Affected scope

Vendor, product and version as the advisories word them.

VendorProductVersionsStatus
MicrosoftMicrosoft Exchange Server 2016 Cumulative Update 2315.01.0.0 to < 15.01.2507.069Vulnerable
MicrosoftMicrosoft Exchange Server 2019 Cumulative Update 1415.02.0.0 to < 15.02.1544.041Vulnerable
MicrosoftMicrosoft Exchange Server 2019 Cumulative Update 1515.02.0.0 to < 15.02.1748.046Vulnerable
MicrosoftMicrosoft Exchange Server Subscription Edition RTM15.02.0.0 to < 15.02.2562.043Vulnerable

Attack characteristics

The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.

Availability

None

Confidentiality

Low

Integrity

Low

Scope

Changed

Attack Complexity

Low

Attack Vector

Network

Privileges Req

None

User Interaction

Required

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactSource
8.1CVSS 3.1high2.85.2Microsoft (CNA), GHSA
6.1CVSS 3.1medium2.82.7NVD
8.1CVSS 3.1highMicrosoft (CNA)

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Weakness & attack patterns

  • CWE-79Cross-site Scripting

Inferred from the weakness class — not observed against this CVE.

CAPEC-66 · SQL InjectionCAPEC-7 · Blind SQL Injection

CISA KEV details

CISA lists a CVE here once it has evidence of exploitation against real targets.

Listed

May 15, 2026

Federal deadline

May 29, 2026

passed 90 days ago

Ransomware use

Unknown

CISA records ransomware use only for campaigns it has confirmed, so “Unknown” means unrecorded, not ruled out. The deadline binds US federal agencies; for everyone else it is a date to argue against.

Public exploit

Capability, not use: code existing is a different claim from anyone running it.

Repositories

8

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.

  • Prioritize edge telemetry for network-reachable Microsoft Exchange Server 2016 Cumulative Update 23, Microsoft Exchange Server 2019 Cumulative Update 14, Microsoft Exchange Server 2019 Cumulative Update 15, Microsoft Exchange Server Subscription Edition RTM.
  • Monitor for scanner or exploit-pattern traffic after 8 public PoC repositories were reported.
web/proxy/WAF logsapplication logsnetwork IDS/IPSdatabase audit logs

Timeline

What happened to this CVE, newest first — with the readings a source repeats on a schedule counted underneath rather than listed.

  1. 2026
  2. Added · CVSS 3.1 6.1 (AV:N)

    Jun 17, 2026 · NVD

  3. Added to CISA KEV catalog

    May 15, 2026 · CISA

  4. Initial · CVE published

    May 14, 2026 · NVD

  5. Added · GHSA-3c39-338m-m4vp published (high)

    May 14, 2026 · GitHub Security Advisory

References

6 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record1

What should defenders know first?

CVE-2026-42897 is Microsoft Exchange Server Spoofing Vulnerability, a medium vulnerability affecting Microsoft Exchange Server 2016 Cumulative Update 23, Microsoft Exchange Server 2019 Cumulative Update 14, Microsoft Exchange Server 2019 Cumulative Update 15, Microsoft Exchange Server Subscription Edition RTM from Microsoft. The current evidence lists it in CISA KEV, and the exploit status is: Yes: CISA KEV signal present. Public exploit evidence is: 8 public PoC repositories reported; 0 marked weaponized in current dataset. The affected-version evidence is listed in the key facts and affected products tables. Defenders should first verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run those versions, then apply vendor patches or mitigations, restrict reachable attack surface, and preserve logs for detection review. CVSS 6.1 describes technical severity, while EPSS 70% helps estimate near-term exploit likelihood; neither replaces asset context. Unknown fields should remain explicit in tickets, and threat actor, IOC, victimology, or payload claims should not be added unless a cited source supports them. Monitor CISA KEV, vendor advisories, NVD changes, public PoC repositories, and internal telemetry for update triggers.