CVE-2026-44647 — OneDev: Path Traversal (read capability via Git LFS pointer resolution)

OneDev is a Git server with CI/CD, kanban, and packages. Prior to 15.0.2, there is behavior that breaks the expected boundary between repository-controlled LFS metadata and server-local filesystem paths. A repository object can steer raw blob reads to arbitrary local files that the server account can access. User with push permission to any repository will be able to access any server files accessible by server process. This vulnerability is fixed in 15.0.2.

Published May 14, 2026Updated May 16, 2026Sources: cvelistV5, GitHub_M

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.

Exploitation

Unreported

no source claims exploitation

EPSS

chance of exploitation in 30 days

Affects

theonedev

onedev

CVSS base

7.1

HIGH

CISA SSVC assessment

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

CISA

Exploitation

None

none · proof-of-concept · active

Automatable

can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps

Technical impact

Partial

partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Affected scope

The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.

Vendors (1)

theonedev

Products (1)

onedev

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

Score	Version	Severity	Expl.	Impact	Source
7.1	CVSS 4.0	HIGH	—	—	cvelistV5

Weakness & attack patterns

CWE-22

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.

Search application, proxy, and WAF logs for requests touching /CD.

References

1 on the record

github.com/theonedev/onedev/security/advisories/GHSA-59wq-74xg-w85v
x_refsource_CONFIRM

Elsewhere on this site

theonedevevery CVE for this vendor
CWE-22other pages naming this weakness

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.