CVE-2026-45328
CVE-2026-45328 — ESF-IDF: Out-of-Bounds Write in ESP-TEE Secure Service Wrappers
ESF-IDF is the Espressif Internet of Things (IOT) Development Framework. In versions 5.5.4 and 6.0, the esp_tee component exposes secure-service wrappers in esp_secure_services.c and esp_secure_services_iram.c that bridge calls from the user application (i.e. the REE) to TEE-protected hardware peripherals (AES, SHA, ECC, HMAC, SPI, MMU, WDT) and to the security feature like attestation, OTA updates, secure storage. This issue has been patched in versions 5.5.5 and 6.0.1.
Published Updated Sources: cvelistV5, GitHub_M
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.
Exploitation
Unreported
no source claims exploitation
EPSS
0%
chance of exploitation in 30 days
CVSS base
9.3
CRITICAL
CISA SSVC assessment
Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.
Exploitation
None
none · proof-of-concept · active
Automatable
No
can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps
Technical impact
Total
partial · total control of the vulnerable component
Affected scope
The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.
Vendors (1)
Products (1)
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.3 | CVSS 3.1 | CRITICAL | — | — | cvelistV5 |
Weakness & attack patterns
- CWE-20
- CWE-787
Attack patterns reported against this CVE. The ATT&CK techniques below are inferred from its weakness class.
- T1562.003Impair Defenses: Impair Command History Logging
- T1574.006Hijack Execution Flow: Dynamic Linker Hijacking
- T1574.007Hijack Execution Flow: Path Interception by PATH Environment Variable
References
7 on the record
- github.com/espressif/esp-idf/security/advisories/GHSA-mmgp-73p4-92xp
x_refsource_CONFIRM
- github.com/espressif/esp-idf/commit/145ba4c42dc8283054cfde9a1c3470db7399192f
x_refsource_MISC
- github.com/espressif/esp-idf/commit/440a5d1906502023f2a0fb0aecbdf0602d14acbf
x_refsource_MISC
- github.com/espressif/esp-idf/commit/764626a1b7c85b943d207da08a2f8f7d7f3def4d
x_refsource_MISC
- github.com/espressif/esp-idf/commit/7867f4a57560bf9fc4a931e37ba02b7a3e9f406b
x_refsource_MISC
- github.com/espressif/esp-idf/commit/afd14ab113acd0ca369965404c99ac42e74d4fcd
x_refsource_MISC
- github.com/espressif/esp-idf/commit/eebabaff2fdc273b1530fe66e55fb3bcd181dfd6
x_refsource_MISC
Elsewhere on this site
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.