CVE-2026-45722
CVE-2026-45722 — Nextcloud: Tables app allows limited SQLi in ORDER BY with malicious sort order argument for Table Views
Nextcloud is an open source content collaboration platform. From versions 0.9.0 to before 0.9.7, and 1.0.0 to before 1.0.2, a missing sanitization in the Tables app allowed a user with access to the tables app to perform a limited SQL injection in the ORDER BY statement of a query. Compared to normal SQL injections, the ORDER BY is limited to extracting a single bit of information per request or to make the database wait for a given time. This issue has been patched in versions 0.9.7 and 1.0.2.
Published Updated Sources: cvelistV5, GitHub_M
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.
Exploitation
Unreported
no source claims exploitation
EPSS
0%
chance of exploitation in 30 days
CVSS base
7.1
HIGH
CISA SSVC assessment
Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.
Exploitation
None
none · proof-of-concept · active
Automatable
No
can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps
Technical impact
Partial
partial · total control of the vulnerable component
Affected scope
The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.
Vendors (1)
Products (1)
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.1 | CVSS 3.1 | HIGH | — | — | cvelistV5 |
Weakness & attack patterns
- CWE-89
References
3 on the record
- github.com/nextcloud/security-advisories/security/advisories/GHSA-5h2w-c7px-hp4j
x_refsource_CONFIRM
- github.com/nextcloud/tables/pull/2186
x_refsource_MISC
- hackerone.com/reports/3446689
x_refsource_MISC
Elsewhere on this site
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.