CVE Intelligence
Skip to main content
MEDIUM

CVE-2026-45810

CVE-2026-45810 — Nextcloud: Propfind requests for file comments allowed to load comments for other files

Nextcloud is an open source content collaboration platform. In Nextcloud Server from versions 31.0.0 to before 31.0.12, and 32.0.0 to before 32.0.3, a missing check of a relation allowed authenticated users with access to any file comment, to read the content of all comments. It is recommended that the Nextcloud Server is upgraded to 31.0.12 or 32.0.3. It is recommended that the Nextcloud Enterprise Server is upgraded to 21.0.9.20, 22.2.10.35, 23.0.12.31, 24.0.12.30, 25.0.13.25, 26.0.13.22, 27.1.11.22, 28.0.14.13, 29.0.16.10, 30.0.17.5, 31.0.12 or 32.0.3

Published Updated Sources: cvelistV5, GitHub_M

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.

Exploitation

Unreported

no source claims exploitation

EPSS

0%

chance of exploitation in 30 days

Affects

nextcloud

security_advisories

CVSS base

6.8

MEDIUM

CISA SSVC assessment

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

CISA

Exploitation

None

none · proof-of-concept · active

Automatable

No

can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps

Technical impact

Partial

partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Affected scope

The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.

Vendors (1)

Products (1)

security advisories

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactSource
6.8CVSS 3.1MEDIUM——cvelistV5

Weakness & attack patterns

  • CWE-639

References

3 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.