CVE-2026-4895
CVE-2026-4895 — Greenshift <= 12.8.9 - Authenticated (Contributor+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting via disablelazy Attribute
The GreenShift - Animation and Page Builder Blocks plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting in versions up to, and including, 12.8.9 This is due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping in the gspb_greenShift_block_script_assets() function. The function uses str_replace() to insert 'fetchpriority="high"' before 'src=' attributes when processing greenshift-blocks/image blocks with the disablelazy attribute enabled. Because this replacement operates on the entire HTML string without parsing, contributors can inject the string 'src=' into HTML attribute values (such as class attributes). When the str_replace executes, the double quotes in the replacement string break out of the attribute context, allowing injection of malicious HTML attributes like onfocus with JavaScript payloads. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with…
Published Updated Sources: cvelistV5, Wordfence
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.
Exploitation
Unreported
no source claims exploitation
EPSS
0%
chance of exploitation in 30 days
CVSS base
6.4
MEDIUM
CISA SSVC assessment
Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.
Exploitation
None
none · proof-of-concept · active
Automatable
No
can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps
Technical impact
Partial
partial · total control of the vulnerable component
Affected scope
The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.
Vendors (1)
Products (1)
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.4 | CVSS 3.1 | MEDIUM | — | — | cvelistV5 |
Weakness & attack patterns
- CWE-79
Detection
Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.
- Search application, proxy, and WAF logs for requests touching /image.
References
7 on the record
- www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/6e3ae3c6-a7d1-46f0-a006-996c1fbe7c7e?source=cve
reference
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/greenshift-animation-and-page-builder-blocks/tags/12.8.6/init.php#L866
reference
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/greenshift-animation-and-page-builder-blocks/trunk/init.php#L889
reference
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/greenshift-animation-and-page-builder-blocks/tags/12.8.6/init.php#L889
reference
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/greenshift-animation-and-page-builder-blocks/trunk/init.php#L866
reference
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/3494855/greenshift-animation-and-page-builder-blocks/trunk/init.php
reference
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?old_path=%2Fgreenshift-animation-and-page-builder-blocks/tags/12.8.9&new_path=%2Fgreenshift-animation-and-page-builder-blocks/tags/12.9.0
reference
Elsewhere on this site
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.