CVE Intelligence
Skip to main content
HIGH

CVE-2026-52775

CVE-2026-52775 — YesWiki Authenticated SQL Injection in ReactionManager

YesWiki is a wiki system written in PHP. Prior to version 4.6.6, YesWiki through the latest development branch contains a SQL injection vulnerability in ReactionManager::deleteUserReaction() that allows any authenticated user to inject arbitrary SQL via the {idreaction} and {id} URL path parameters. The parameters are concatenated directly into a SQL LIKE clause without escaping or parameterization. This issue has been patched in version 4.6.6.

Published Updated Sources: cvelistV5, GitHub_M

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.

Exploitation

Unreported

no source claims exploitation

EPSS

0%

chance of exploitation in 30 days

Affects

yeswiki

yeswiki

CVSS base

8.8

HIGH

CISA SSVC assessment

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

CISA

Exploitation

PoC

none · proof-of-concept · active

Automatable

No

can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps

Technical impact

Total

partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Affected scope

The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.

Vendors (1)

yeswiki

Products (1)

yeswiki

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactSource
8.8CVSS 3.1HIGH——cvelistV5

Weakness & attack patterns

  • CWE-89

References

3 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

  • yeswikievery CVE for this vendor
  • CWE-89other pages naming this weakness

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.