CVE Intelligence
Skip to main content
CISA KEVcriticalPath Traversalpublic exploit

CVE-2026-59310

CVE-2026-59310 — vCenter directory-traversal vulnerability

VMware vCenter contains a directory traversal vulnerability in the Syslog server. A malicious actor with network access to vCenter may exploit this issue to execute arbitrary code.

Published Updated Sources: NVD, VMware (CNA), CISA, FIRST EPSS, SOCRadar CTI

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.

Exploitation

Confirmed

CISA KEV, listed Aug 18, 2026

EPSS

46%

ahead of 99% of scored CVEs

Affects

VMware

13 products listed

CVSS base

9.8

critical

CISA SSVC assessment

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

CISA

Exploitation

Active

none · proof-of-concept · active

Automatable

Yes

can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps

Technical impact

Total

partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Remediation

The vendor's own words where we have them.

Upgrade Cloud Foundation to a fixed release. Apply vendor patches per advisory and restrict external exposure of the affected component until patched.

CISA required action

Apply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Federal deadline Aug 21, 2026 — passed 11 days ago

First 24 hours

Ordered from the record's own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found.

  • Identify exposed assets running affected vendor/product/version combinations.
  • Treat as emergency remediation because CISA KEV status is present.
  • Search available logs for exploit probes, errors, authentication anomalies, or suspicious child processes matching the vulnerability class.

Affected scope

Vendor, product and version as the advisories word them.

VendorProductVersionsStatus
VMwareCloud Foundation9.1.x.xVulnerable
VMwareCloud Foundation9.0.x.xVulnerable
VMwareCloud Foundation5.xVulnerable
VMwarevSphere Foundation9.1.x.xVulnerable
VMwarevSphere Foundation9.0.x.xVulnerable
VMwarevCenter9.1.x.x to < 9.1.0.0300Vulnerable
VMwarevCenter9.0.x.x to < 9.0.2.0100Vulnerable
VMwarevCenter8.0 to < 8.0 U3kVulnerable
VMwareTelco Cloud Infrastructure3.0Vulnerable
VMwareTelco Cloud Platform5.1.xVulnerable
VMwareTelco Cloud Platform5.0.xVulnerable
VMwareTelco Cloud Platform4.xVulnerable

Attack characteristics

The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.

Availability

High

Confidentiality

High

Integrity

High

Scope

Unchanged

Attack Complexity

Low

Attack Vector

Network

Privileges Req

None

User Interaction

None

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactSource
9.8CVSS 3.1critical3.95.9vmware.com (CNA), VMware (CNA)

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

What this weakness leads to

MITRE's own consequences and mitigations for the weakness class — the authority's wording, not guidance derived from the CVSS vector.

MITRE

CWE-22 · Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')

  • Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
  • Modify Files or Directories
  • Read Files or Directories
  • DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart

Mitigation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an accept known good input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, boat may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as red or blue. Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright. When validating filenames, use stringent allowlists that limit the character set to be used. If feasible, only allow a single . character in the filename to avoid weaknesses such as CWE-23, and exclude directory separators such as / to avoid CWE-36. Use a list of allowable file extensions, which will help to avoid CWE-434. Do not rely exclusively on a filtering mechanism that removes potentially dangerous characters. This is equivalent to a denylist, which may be incomplete (CWE-184). For example, filtering / is insufficient protection if the filesystem also supports the use of as a directory separator. Another possible error could occur when the filtering is applied in a way that still produces dangerous data (CWE-182). For example, if ../ sequences are removed from the .../...// string in a sequential fashion, two instances of ../ would be removed from the original string, but the remaining characters would still form the ../ string.

Weakness & attack patterns

  • CWE-22Path Traversal

Attack patterns reported against this CVE. The ATT&CK techniques below are inferred from its weakness class.

CAPEC-126 · Path TraversalCAPEC-76 · Manipulating Web Input to File System CallsCAPEC-79 · Using Slashes in Alternate EncodingCAPEC-64 · Using Slashes and URL Encoding Combined to Bypass Validation LogicCAPEC-78 · Using Escaped Slashes in Alternate Encoding

CISA KEV details

CISA lists a CVE here once it has evidence of exploitation against real targets.

Listed

Aug 18, 2026

Federal deadline

Aug 21, 2026

passed 11 days ago

Ransomware use

Unknown

CISA records ransomware use only for campaigns it has confirmed, so “Unknown” means unrecorded, not ruled out. The deadline binds US federal agencies; for everyone else it is a date to argue against.

Public exploit

Capability, not use: code existing is a different claim from anyone running it.

Repositories

2

Exploit entries

1

Exploit-DB and CTI exploit indexes

Social mentions

Posts naming this CVE. Attention, not evidence of exploitation — it spikes on disclosure and decays whether or not anything is exploited.

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.

  • Prioritize edge telemetry for network-reachable Cloud Foundation, vSphere Foundation, vCenter, Telco Cloud Infrastructure, Telco Cloud Platform.
  • Monitor for scanner or exploit-pattern traffic after 3 public PoC repositories were reported.
web/proxy/WAF logsapplication logsnetwork IDS/IPS

Groups associated with this CVE

Groups reported in connection with this vulnerability. A reported association, not a confirmed observation of that group using it — and not scoped to any sector or campaign.

Lazarus GroupCOBALT DICKENS
  • ip5.34.176.10028

    AlienVault OTX Feeds · Aug 17, 2026

  • ip146.59.252.17880

    AbuseIPDB Hourly Update · May 6, 2026

  • hostnameintel.se9ly9upbhay.shop49

    AlienVault OTX Feeds · Aug 17, 2026

  • ip5.34.177.3828

    AlienVault OTX Feeds · Aug 17, 2026

  • ip185.144.28.12028

    AlienVault OTX Feeds · Aug 17, 2026

SOCRadar1 more indicators on this CVEShowing 5 of 6 · Hashes, addresses and domains from a live threat exchangeUnlock free

Timeline

What happened to this CVE, newest first — with the readings a source repeats on a schedule counted underneath rather than listed.

  1. 2026
  2. Added · CVSS 3.1 9.8 (AV:N)

    Aug 19, 2026 · NVD

  3. Added to CISA KEV catalog

    Aug 18, 2026 · CISA

  4. Cve is exploited BiuTrap/CVE-2026-59310

    Aug 17, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI

  5. Initial · CVE published

    Jul 30, 2026 · NVD

Source activity

Readings a source repeats on a schedule, counted rather than listed.

  • 15×TweetsAug 14, 2026 – Aug 29, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI
  • 13×SVRS was changedAug 13, 2026 – Aug 29, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI
  • TelegramAug 14, 2026 – Aug 25, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI
  • ModifiedAug 14, 2026 – Aug 18, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI
  • Github ReposAug 17, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI

References

7 on the record

Coverage

20 stories from the feeds we poll

Elsewhere on this site

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • Only the 5 indicator(s) reported for this CVE are available; no packet-level or host-forensic artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record1

What should defenders know first?

CVE-2026-59310 is vCenter directory-traversal vulnerability, a critical vulnerability affecting Cloud Foundation, vSphere Foundation, vCenter, Telco Cloud Infrastructure, Telco Cloud Platform from VMware. The current evidence lists it in CISA KEV, and the exploit status is: Yes: CISA KEV signal present. Public exploit evidence is: 3 public PoC repositories reported; 0 marked weaponized in current dataset. The affected-version evidence is listed in the key facts and affected products tables. Defenders should first verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run those versions, then apply vendor patches or mitigations, restrict reachable attack surface, and preserve logs for detection review. CVSS 9.8 describes technical severity, while EPSS 46% helps estimate near-term exploit likelihood; neither replaces asset context. Unknown fields should remain explicit in tickets, and threat actor, IOC, victimology, or payload claims should not be added unless a cited source supports them. Monitor CISA KEV, vendor advisories, NVD changes, public PoC repositories, and internal telemetry for update triggers.