CVE Intelligence
Skip to main content
highpublic exploit

CVE-2026-6485

CVE-2026-6485 — UEFI BIOS embedded Shell can be used to bypass Secure Boot

UEFI BIOS embedded Shell could be used to bypass Secure Boot via shell commands or startup scripts.

Published Updated Sources: NVD, Insyde Software (CNA), GitHub, SOCRadar CTI

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.

Exploitation

Exploit code

public exploit, none observed

EPSS

0%

ahead of 0% of scored CVEs

Affects

Insyde Software

InsydeH2O

CVSS base

8.2

high

Remediation

The vendor's own words where we have them.

Kernel 5.3: Version 05.3A.25 Kernel 5.4: Version 05.48.25 Kernel 5.5: Version 05.56.25 Kernel 5.6: Version 05.63.25

First 24 hours

Ordered from the record's own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found.

  • Identify exposed assets running affected vendor/product/version combinations.
  • Prioritize based on EPSS, PoC availability, and external exposure.
  • Search available logs for exploit probes, errors, authentication anomalies, or suspicious child processes matching the vulnerability class.

Affected scope

Vendor, product and version as the advisories word them.

VendorProductVersionsStatus
Insyde SoftwareInsydeH2OSee in the SolutionVulnerable

Attack characteristics

The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.

Availability

High

Confidentiality

High

Integrity

High

Scope

Changed

Attack Complexity

Low

Attack Vector

Local

Privileges Req

High

User Interaction

None

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactSource
8.2CVSS 3.1high1.56CNA, Insyde Software (CNA)

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

What this weakness leads to

MITRE's own consequences and mitigations for the weakness class — the authority's wording, not guidance derived from the CVSS vector.

MITRE

CWE-489 · Active Debug Code

  • Bypass Protection Mechanism
  • Read Application Data
  • Gain Privileges or Assume Identity
  • Varies by Context

Mitigation: Remove debug code before deploying the application.::

Weakness & attack patterns

  • CWE-489

Attack patterns reported against this CVE. The ATT&CK techniques below are inferred from its weakness class.

CAPEC-121 · Exploit Non-Production Interfaces

Public exploit

Capability, not use: code existing is a different claim from anyone running it.

Repositories

15

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.

  • Monitor for scanner or exploit-pattern traffic after 15 public PoC repositories were reported.

Timeline

What happened to this CVE, newest first — with the readings a source repeats on a schedule counted underneath rather than listed.

  1. 2026
  2. Added · CVSS 3.1 8.2 (AV:L)

    Sep 9, 2026 · NVD

  3. Initial · CVE published

    Sep 9, 2026 · NVD

  4. CVE published by MITRE.

    Sep 9, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI

References

1 on the record

Coverage

1 story from the feeds we poll

Elsewhere on this site

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record1

What should defenders know first?

CVE-2026-6485 is UEFI BIOS embedded Shell can be used to bypass Secure Boot, a high vulnerability affecting InsydeH2O from Insyde Software. The current evidence does not list it in CISA KEV, and the exploit status is: Active exploitation is not confirmed from current sources for CVE-2026-6485. Public exploit evidence is: 15 public PoC repositories reported; 0 marked weaponized in current dataset. The affected-version evidence is listed in the key facts and affected products tables. Defenders should first verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run those versions, then apply vendor patches or mitigations, restrict reachable attack surface, and preserve logs for detection review. CVSS 8.2 describes technical severity, while EPSS 0% helps estimate near-term exploit likelihood; neither replaces asset context. Unknown fields should remain explicit in tickets, and threat actor, IOC, victimology, or payload claims should not be added unless a cited source supports them. Monitor CISA KEV, vendor advisories, NVD changes, public PoC repositories, and internal telemetry for update triggers.