What is CVE-2026-67105?

CVE-2026-67105 is HCL BigFix Service Management is affected by multiple security vulnerabilities. The supplied enrichment data classifies it as Unclassified mapped to CWE-319 CWE-319.

Which versions are affected?

Affected product and version evidence is listed in the product table above. Current public advisories should be checked for exact version scope before patch targeting is finalized.

Is there active exploitation?

Active exploitation is not confirmed from current sources for CVE-2026-67105. If exploitation is not confirmed from current sources, teams should document that status and continue monitoring KEV, vendor, and telemetry updates.

No. CVE-2026-67105 is not listed in CISA KEV in the supplied enrichment data. KEV status should be monitored because it can change after initial disclosure or after exploitation becomes publicly confirmed.

Is there a public exploit?

1 public PoC repositories reported; 0 marked weaponized in current dataset. Public exploit or PoC availability should raise triage priority, especially for exposed or business-critical systems.

How can defenders detect it?

Start with web/proxy/WAF logs, application logs, network IDS/IPS where available. Look for vulnerability-class behavior, product errors, suspicious authentication events, exploit probes, and abnormal process activity based only on evidence that applies to the affected product.

How should teams prioritize it?

Prioritize CVE-2026-67105 using CVSS 7.4, EPSS 0%, KEV status, public PoC status, and asset exposure. Internet-facing, privileged, or business-critical deployments should be handled first.

Are workarounds available?

The supplied mitigation guidance says to apply vendor patches and restrict external exposure until fixed. Fixed-version evidence is listed in the mitigation section above.

Which threat actors are linked publicly?

No public threat actor linkage is confirmed from current sources. Do not attribute exploitation to a threat actor unless the source evidence explicitly supports that linkage.

What should be done in the next 24 hours?

Identify exposed assets running affected vendor/product/version combinations. Prioritize based on EPSS, PoC availability, and external exposure. Search available logs for exploit probes, errors, authentication anomalies, or suspicious child processes matching the vulnerability class. Open remediation tickets with affected assets, owners, evidence status, and detection coverage so decisions are traceable.

highpublic exploit

CVE-2026-67105

CVE-2026-67105 — HCL BigFix Service Management is affected by multiple security vulnerabilities.

HCL BigFix Service Management is affected by an Insecure Communication vulnerability, which could allow an attacker with internal network access to intercept unencrypted HTTP traffic between backend services, enabling the extraction of sensitive data and potential man-in-the-middle (MitM) attacks.

Published Oct 1, 2026Updated Oct 1, 2026Sources: NVD, HCL Software (CNA), GitHub, GitHub Security Advisory, SOCRadar CTI

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.

Exploitation

Exploit code

public exploit, none observed

EPSS

ahead of 0% of scored CVEs

Affects

HCL Software

HCL BigFix Service Management

CVSS base

7.4

high

Remediation

The vendor's own words where we have them.

Upgrade HCL BigFix Service Management to a fixed release. Apply vendor patches per advisory and restrict external exposure of the affected component until patched.

First 24 hours

Ordered from the record's own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found.

Identify exposed assets running affected vendor/product/version combinations.
Prioritize based on EPSS, PoC availability, and external exposure.
Search available logs for exploit probes, errors, authentication anomalies, or suspicious child processes matching the vulnerability class.

Affected scope

Vendor, product and version as the advisories word them.

Vendor	Product	Versions	Status
HCL Software	HCL BigFix Service Management	Version 27	Vulnerable

Attack characteristics

The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.

Availability

None

Confidentiality

High

Integrity

High

Scope

Unchanged

Attack Complexity

High

Attack Vector

Network

Privileges Req

None

User Interaction

None

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

Score	Version	Severity	Expl.	Impact	Source
7.4	CVSS 3.1	high	2.2	5.2	hcl.com (CNA), HCL Software (CNA), GHSA

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

What this weakness leads to

MITRE's own consequences and mitigations for the weakness class — the authority's wording, not guidance derived from the CVSS vector.

MITRE

CWE-319 · Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information

Read Application Data
Modify Files or Directories

Mitigation: Encrypt the data with a reliable encryption scheme before transmitting.

Weakness & attack patterns

CWE-319

Attack patterns reported against this CVE. The ATT&CK techniques below are inferred from its weakness class.

CAPEC-477 · Signature Spoofing by Mixing Signed and Unsigned ContentCAPEC-383 · Harvesting Information via API Event MonitoringCAPEC-65 · Sniff Application CodeCAPEC-102 · Session SidejackingCAPEC-117 · Interception

T1056.004Input Capture: Credential API Hooking
T1040Network Sniffing

Public exploit

Capability, not use: code existing is a different claim from anyone running it.

Repositories

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.

Prioritize edge telemetry for network-reachable HCL BigFix Service Management.
Monitor for scanner or exploit-pattern traffic after 1 public PoC repositories were reported.

web/proxy/WAF logsapplication logsnetwork IDS/IPS

Timeline

What happened to this CVE, newest first — with the readings a source repeats on a schedule counted underneath rather than listed.

2026
Added · CVSS 3.1 7.4 (AV:N)
Oct 1, 2026 · NVD
Initial · CVE published
Oct 1, 2026 · NVD
Added · GHSA-xqgc-v2f3-h4v3 published (high)
Oct 1, 2026 · GitHub Security Advisory
CVE published by NIST.
Oct 1, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI

References

4 on the record

support.hcl-software.com/csm?id=kb_article&sysparm_article=KB0134015
Vendor Advisory
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-67105
NVD
github.com/advisories/GHSA-xqgc-v2f3-h4v3
Exploit, Third Party Advisory
support.hcl-software.com/csm?id=kb_article&sysparm_article=KB0134015
NIST

Elsewhere on this site

HCL Softwareevery CVE for this vendor
Unclassifiedsame class
CWE-319other pages naming this weakness

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.

Answered from this record1

What should defenders know first?

CVE-2026-67105 is HCL BigFix Service Management is affected by multiple security vulnerabilities., a high vulnerability affecting HCL BigFix Service Management from HCL Software. The current evidence does not list it in CISA KEV, and the exploit status is: Active exploitation is not confirmed from current sources for CVE-2026-67105. Public exploit evidence is: 1 public PoC repositories reported; 0 marked weaponized in current dataset. The affected-version evidence is listed in the key facts and affected products tables. Defenders should first verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run those versions, then apply vendor patches or mitigations, restrict reachable attack surface, and preserve logs for detection review. CVSS 7.4 describes technical severity, while EPSS 0% helps estimate near-term exploit likelihood; neither replaces asset context. Unknown fields should remain explicit in tickets, and threat actor, IOC, victimology, or payload claims should not be added unless a cited source supports them. Monitor CISA KEV, vendor advisories, NVD changes, public PoC repositories, and internal telemetry for update triggers.