CVE Intelligence
Skip to main content
HIGH

CVE-2026-68500

CVE-2026-68500 — Sylius Mollie Plugin: Payment status forgery via the payment webhook

Sylius Mollie Plugin provides Mollie payment integration for Sylius applications. Prior to 2.2.8, 3.2.4, and 3.3.1, Sylius Mollie Plugin's POST /{_locale}/update-payment payment webhook accepts attacker-controlled id and orderId parameters but does not verify that the Mollie payment belongs to the referenced Sylius order, allowing an unauthenticated attacker with any valid paid Mollie payment ID to mark a victim order as paid without transferring funds for that order. This issue is fixed in 2.2.8, 3.2.4, and 3.3.1.

Published Updated Sources: cvelistV5, GitHub_M

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.

Exploitation

Unreported

no source claims exploitation

EPSS

0%

chance of exploitation in 30 days

Affects

sylius

mollieplugin

CVSS base

7.5

HIGH

CISA SSVC assessment

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

CISA

Exploitation

None

none · proof-of-concept · active

Automatable

Yes

can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps

Technical impact

Partial

partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Affected scope

The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.

Vendors (1)

Products (1)

mollieplugin

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactSource
7.5CVSS 3.1HIGHcvelistV5

Weakness & attack patterns

  • CWE-639

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.

  • Search application, proxy, and WAF logs for requests touching /update-payment.

References

10 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

  • syliusevery CVE for this vendor
  • CWE-639other pages naming this weakness

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.