CVE-2026-72883
CVE-2026-72883 — Dokploy: WebSocket Terminal Missing Service-Level Access Control
Dokploy is a free, self-hostable Platform as a Service (PaaS). Prior to 0.29.13, the WebSocket handlers in apps/dokploy/server/wss/terminal.ts, apps/dokploy/server/wss/docker-container-terminal.ts, apps/dokploy/server/wss/docker-container-logs.ts, and apps/dokploy/server/wss/docker-stats.ts validate organization membership but do not enforce checkServiceAccess, accessedServerIds, or accessedServices, allowing an authenticated organization member to obtain root terminal access and read logs or statistics for restricted servers and services. This issue is fixed in version 0.29.13.
Published Updated Sources: cvelistV5, GitHub_M
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.
Exploitation
Unreported
no source claims exploitation
EPSS
1%
chance of exploitation in 30 days
CVSS base
8.8
HIGH
CISA SSVC assessment
Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.
Exploitation
None
none · proof-of-concept · active
Automatable
No
can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps
Technical impact
Total
partial · total control of the vulnerable component
Affected scope
The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.
Vendors (1)
Products (1)
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.8 | CVSS 3.1 | HIGH | — | — | cvelistV5 |
Weakness & attack patterns
- CWE-862
Attack patterns reported against this CVE. The ATT&CK techniques below are inferred from its weakness class.
- T1211Exploitation for Defensive Evasion
- T1542.002Pre-OS Boot: Component Firmware
- T1556Modify Authentication Process
Detection
Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.
- Search application, proxy, and WAF logs for requests touching /dokploy/server/wss/terminal.ts, /dokploy/server/wss/docker-container-terminal.ts, /dokploy/server/wss/docker-container-logs.ts, /dokploy/server/wss/docker-stats.ts.
References
5 on the record
- github.com/Dokploy/dokploy/security/advisories/GHSA-qf9j-c9p4-r4xp
x_refsource_CONFIRM
- github.com/Dokploy/dokploy/pull/4865
x_refsource_MISC
- github.com/Dokploy/dokploy/commit/1bc76e9e5b8a9acd14a58cd8a1828c25918f162e
x_refsource_MISC
- github.com/Dokploy/dokploy/commit/68f5afae42fca353dcb3d3bc6219ffe9e168cb91
x_refsource_MISC
- github.com/Dokploy/dokploy/releases/tag/v0.29.13
x_refsource_MISC
Elsewhere on this site
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.