CVE-2026-72885
CVE-2026-72885 — Dokploy: Authenticated Command Injection in Dokploy Dockerfile Builder
Dokploy is a free, self-hostable Platform as a Service (PaaS). Prior to 0.29.13, dockerContextPath accepted by apps/dokploy/components/dashboard/application/build/show.tsx flows through getDockerContextPath in packages/server/src/utils/filesystem/directory.ts into the unquoted cd command in packages/server/src/utils/builders/docker-file.ts before execution by execAsync, allowing an authenticated application editor to execute arbitrary commands on the Dokploy host. This issue is fixed in version 0.29.13.
Published Updated Sources: NVD, Dokploy (CNA), GitHub, SOCRadar CTI
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.
Exploitation
Exploit code
public exploit, none observed
EPSS
0%
ahead of 0% of scored CVEs
CVSS base
0
low
Remediation
The vendor's own words where we have them.
Upgrade dokploy to a fixed release. Apply vendor patches per advisory and restrict external exposure of the affected component until patched.
First 24 hours
Ordered from the record's own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found.
- Identify exposed assets running affected vendor/product/version combinations.
- Prioritize based on EPSS, PoC availability, and external exposure.
- Search available logs for exploit probes, errors, authentication anomalies, or suspicious child processes matching the vulnerability class.
Affected scope
Vendor, product and version as the advisories word them.
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dokploy | dokploy | < 0.29.13 | Vulnerable |
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | CVSS 4.0 | none | — | — | Dokploy (CNA) |
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
What this weakness leads to
MITRE's own consequences and mitigations for the weakness class — the authority's wording, not guidance derived from the CVSS vector.
CWE-78 · Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
- Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
- DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart
- Read Files or Directories
- Modify Files or Directories
Mitigation: If at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.
Weakness & attack patterns
- CWE-78OS Command Injection
Attack patterns reported against this CVE. The ATT&CK techniques below are inferred from its weakness class.
Public exploit
Capability, not use: code existing is a different claim from anyone running it.
Repositories
1
Detection
Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.
- Search application, proxy, and WAF logs for requests touching /dokploy/components/dashboard/application/build/show.tsx, /server/src/utils/filesystem/directory.ts, /server/src/utils/builders/docker-file.ts.
- Monitor for scanner or exploit-pattern traffic after 1 public PoC repositories were reported.
Timeline
What happened to this CVE, newest first — with the readings a source repeats on a schedule counted underneath rather than listed.
- 2026
Added · CVSS 3.1 0.0
Aug 10, 2026 · NVD
Initial · CVE published
Aug 10, 2026 · NVD
References
4 on the record
- github.com/Dokploy/dokploy/commit/cba0b253c7de4157dd932de7f16a2ad247c7cee9
Exploit, Third Party Advisory, Mitre
- github.com/Dokploy/dokploy/pull/4860
Exploit, Third Party Advisory, Mitre
- github.com/Dokploy/dokploy/releases/tag/v0.29.13
Exploit, Third Party Advisory, Mitre
- github.com/Dokploy/dokploy/security/advisories/GHSA-qjrc-g63x-qhp9
Exploit, Third Party Advisory, Mitre
Elsewhere on this site
- Dokployevery CVE for this vendor
- Remote Code Execsame class
- CWE-78other pages naming this weakness
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record1
What should defenders know first?
CVE-2026-72885 is Dokploy: Authenticated Command Injection in Dokploy Dockerfile Builder, a low vulnerability affecting dokploy from Dokploy. The current evidence does not list it in CISA KEV, and the exploit status is: Active exploitation is not confirmed from current sources for CVE-2026-72885. Public exploit evidence is: 1 public PoC repositories reported; 0 marked weaponized in current dataset. The affected-version evidence is listed in the key facts and affected products tables. Defenders should first verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run those versions, then apply vendor patches or mitigations, restrict reachable attack surface, and preserve logs for detection review. CVSS 0 describes technical severity, while EPSS 0% helps estimate near-term exploit likelihood; neither replaces asset context. Unknown fields should remain explicit in tickets, and threat actor, IOC, victimology, or payload claims should not be added unless a cited source supports them. Monitor CISA KEV, vendor advisories, NVD changes, public PoC repositories, and internal telemetry for update triggers.