CVE-2026-76899
CVE-2026-76899 — CordysCRM: Authenticated SQL injection via `sort.name` on `POST /account-pool/page`
CordysCRM is an open source AI-powered customer relationship management system that supports private deployment. From 1.7.0 until 1.7.4, POST /account-pool/page allows an authenticated caller with MODULE_SETTING_UPDATE to place an arbitrary database function in SortRequest.name because CustomerPoolController.page omits Spring request validation, SortRequest.getName relies on an incomplete blacklist, and the CommonMapper.xml sort fragment inserts ${sortName} into an ORDER BY clause. Functions such as extractvalue and updatexml bypass the blacklist and can expose database values through an error oracle when the query returns at least one row. This issue is fixed in version 1.7.4.
Published Updated Sources: NVD, 1Panel-dev (CNA), GitHub, SOCRadar CTI
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.
Exploitation
Unreported
no source claims exploitation
EPSS
0%
ahead of 0% of scored CVEs
CVSS base
5.7
medium
Remediation
The vendor's own words where we have them.
Upgrade CordysCRM to a fixed release. Apply vendor patches per advisory and restrict external exposure of the affected component until patched.
First 24 hours
Ordered from the record's own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found.
- Identify exposed assets running affected vendor/product/version combinations.
- Prioritize based on EPSS, PoC availability, and external exposure.
- Search available logs for exploit probes, errors, authentication anomalies, or suspicious child processes matching the vulnerability class.
Affected scope
Vendor, product and version as the advisories word them.
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1Panel-dev | CordysCRM | < 1.7.4 | Vulnerable |
Attack characteristics
The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.
Availability
Low
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
Low
Scope
Unchanged
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Vector
Network
Privileges Req
High
User Interaction
Required
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.7 | CVSS 3.1 | medium | 0.9 | 4.7 | GitHub (CNA), 1Panel-dev (CNA) |
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
What this weakness leads to
MITRE's own consequences and mitigations for the weakness class — the authority's wording, not guidance derived from the CVSS vector.
CWE-89 · Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')
- Read Application Data
- Bypass Protection Mechanism
- Modify Application Data
Mitigation: Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using persistence layers such as Hibernate or Enterprise Java Beans, which can provide significant protection against SQL injection if used properly.
CWE-1284 · Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input
- Varies by Context
Mitigation: Assume all input is malicious. Use an accept known good input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range of acceptable values, missing or extra inputs, syntax, consistency across related fields, and conformance to business rules. As an example of business rule logic, boat may be syntactically valid because it only contains alphanumeric characters, but it is not valid if the input is only expected to contain colors such as red or blue. Do not rely exclusively on looking for malicious or malformed inputs. This is likely to miss at least one undesirable input, especially if the code's environment changes. This can give attackers enough room to bypass the intended validation. However, denylists can be useful for detecting potential attacks or determining which inputs are so malformed that they should be rejected outright.
Weakness & attack patterns
- CWE-89SQL Injection
- CWE-1284
Attack patterns reported against this CVE. The ATT&CK techniques below are inferred from its weakness class.
Detection
Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.
- Search application, proxy, and WAF logs for requests touching /account-pool/page.
- Prioritize edge telemetry for network-reachable CordysCRM.
Timeline
What happened to this CVE, newest first — with the readings a source repeats on a schedule counted underneath rather than listed.
- 2026
Added · CVSS 3.1 5.7 (AV:N)
Sep 18, 2026 · NVD
Initial · CVE published
Sep 18, 2026 · NVD
CVE published by MITRE.
Sep 18, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI
References
5 on the record
- github.com/1Panel-dev/CordysCRM/commit/3e6a7003ac5c94bc1166c6065e64420be2f188a8
Exploit, Third Party Advisory, Mitre
- github.com/1Panel-dev/CordysCRM/commit/b217166af2935c827c8d73bf55c563dd328692f5
Exploit, Third Party Advisory, Mitre
- github.com/1Panel-dev/CordysCRM/pull/2975
Exploit, Third Party Advisory, Mitre
- github.com/1Panel-dev/CordysCRM/releases/tag/v1.7.4
Exploit, Third Party Advisory, Mitre
- github.com/1Panel-dev/CordysCRM/security/advisories/GHSA-x6p7-vhgp-6r3q
Exploit, Third Party Advisory, Mitre
Elsewhere on this site
- 1Panel-devevery CVE for this vendor
- Injectionsame class
- CWE-89other pages naming this weakness
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record1
What should defenders know first?
CVE-2026-76899 is CordysCRM: Authenticated SQL injection via `sort.name` on `POST /account-pool/page`, a medium vulnerability affecting CordysCRM from 1Panel-dev. The current evidence does not list it in CISA KEV, and the exploit status is: Active exploitation is not confirmed from current sources for CVE-2026-76899. Public exploit evidence is: A public PoC is not confirmed from current sources for CVE-2026-76899. The affected-version evidence is listed in the key facts and affected products tables. Defenders should first verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run those versions, then apply vendor patches or mitigations, restrict reachable attack surface, and preserve logs for detection review. CVSS 5.7 describes technical severity, while EPSS 0% helps estimate near-term exploit likelihood; neither replaces asset context. Unknown fields should remain explicit in tickets, and threat actor, IOC, victimology, or payload claims should not be added unless a cited source supports them. Monitor CISA KEV, vendor advisories, NVD changes, public PoC repositories, and internal telemetry for update triggers.