CVE Intelligence
Skip to main content
medium

CVE-2026-77955

CVE-2026-77955 — Possible ZONEMD verification bypass window

In NLnet Labs Unbound 1.13.2 up to and including 1.26.1, a vulnerability in ZONEMD configured zones (zonemd-check: yes) which are located below (but not at) a trust anchor allow for an attack window where (tampered with) zone contents are served (or stored to disk) prior to the ZONEMD integrity check. This is caused by the needed DS/DNSKEY asynchronous resolution that needs to happen before the ZONEMD check completes. If a zonefile is written to disk (zonefile: option) while the ZONEMD check failed, the tampered data are reloaded on startup and available until ZONEMD verification concludes again. If verification fails, the data is not served any more but still persists on disk for future reloads.

Published Updated Sources: NVD, NLnet Labs (CNA), GitHub, GitHub Security Advisory, Red Hat (VEX), SOCRadar CTI

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.

Exploitation

Unreported

no source claims exploitation

EPSS

0%

ahead of 0% of scored CVEs

Affects

NLnet Labs

Unbound

CVSS base

4.4

medium

Remediation

The vendor's own words where we have them.

This issue is fixed starting with version 1.26.1

Red Hat VEX · CVE-2026-77955

fixed0affected2not affected0

none_available: Fix deferred

First 24 hours

Ordered from the record's own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found.

  • Identify exposed assets running affected vendor/product/version combinations.
  • Prioritize based on EPSS, PoC availability, and external exposure.
  • Search available logs for exploit probes, errors, authentication anomalies, or suspicious child processes matching the vulnerability class.

Affected scope

Vendor, product and version as the advisories word them.

VendorProductVersionsStatus
NLnet LabsUnbound1.13.2 to < 1.26.1Vulnerable

Attack characteristics

The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.

Availability

None

Confidentiality

None

Integrity

High

Scope

Unchanged

Attack Complexity

High

Attack Vector

Network

Privileges Req

High

User Interaction

None

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactSource
4.4CVSS 3.1medium0.73.6nlnetlabs.nl (CNA), NLnet Labs (CNA), GHSA, Red Hat (VEX)

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

What this weakness leads to

MITRE's own consequences and mitigations for the weakness class — the authority's wording, not guidance derived from the CVSS vector.

MITRE

CWE-345 · Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity

  • Varies by Context
  • Unexpected State::

Weakness & attack patterns

  • CWE-345

Attack patterns reported against this CVE. The ATT&CK techniques below are inferred from its weakness class.

CAPEC-387 · Navigation Remapping To Propagate Malicious ContentCAPEC-218 · Spoofing of UDDI/ebXML MessagesCAPEC-148 · Content SpoofingCAPEC-142 · DNS Cache PoisoningCAPEC-388 · Application API Button HijackingCAPEC-386 · Application API Navigation RemappingCAPEC-384 · Application API Message Manipulation via Man-in-the-MiddleCAPEC-141 · Cache PoisoningCAPEC-111 · JSON Hijacking (aka JavaScript Hijacking)CAPEC-385 · Transaction or Event Tampering via Application API Manipulation
  • T1557.002Adversary-in-the-Middle: ARP Cache Poisoning
  • T1584.002Compromise Infrastructure: DNS Server
  • T1491Defacement

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.

  • Search application, proxy, and WAF logs for requests touching /DNSKEY.
  • Prioritize edge telemetry for network-reachable Unbound.
web/proxy/WAF logsapplication logsnetwork IDS/IPS

Timeline

What happened to this CVE, newest first — with the readings a source repeats on a schedule counted underneath rather than listed.

  1. 2026
  2. Added · CVSS 3.1 4.4 (AV:N)

    Sep 16, 2026 · NVD

  3. Initial · CVE published

    Sep 16, 2026 · NVD

  4. Reported · Fixes released with version 1.26.1

    Sep 16, 2026 · NLnet Labs

  5. Added · GHSA-w62x-5q5r-fgmp published (medium)

    Sep 16, 2026 · GitHub Security Advisory

  6. CVE published by MITRE.

    Sep 16, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI

  7. Reported · NLnet Labs shares patch with Qifan Zhang

    Sep 1, 2026 · NLnet Labs

  8. Reported · Yuqi Qiu verifies patch

    Aug 20, 2026 · NLnet Labs

  9. Reported · NLnet Labs shares patch with Yuqi Qiu

    Aug 19, 2026 · NLnet Labs

  10. Issue reported by Qifan Zhang

    Aug 16, 2026 · NLnet Labs

  11. Issue reported by Yuqi Qiu

    Aug 11, 2026 · NLnet Labs

References

6 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record1

What should defenders know first?

CVE-2026-77955 is Possible ZONEMD verification bypass window, a medium vulnerability affecting Unbound from NLnet Labs. The current evidence does not list it in CISA KEV, and the exploit status is: Active exploitation is not confirmed from current sources for CVE-2026-77955. Public exploit evidence is: A public PoC is not confirmed from current sources for CVE-2026-77955. The affected-version evidence is listed in the key facts and affected products tables. Defenders should first verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run those versions, then apply vendor patches or mitigations, restrict reachable attack surface, and preserve logs for detection review. CVSS 4.4 describes technical severity, while EPSS 0% helps estimate near-term exploit likelihood; neither replaces asset context. Unknown fields should remain explicit in tickets, and threat actor, IOC, victimology, or payload claims should not be added unless a cited source supports them. Monitor CISA KEV, vendor advisories, NVD changes, public PoC repositories, and internal telemetry for update triggers.