CVE Intelligence
Skip to main content
MEDIUM

CVE-2026-84664

CVE-2026-84664 Vulnerability Analysis & Exploit Intelligence

Jenkins GitLab Plugin 1.9.16 and earlier allows overwriting the global GitLab connection configuration through Stapler data binding, allowing attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL using GitLab API tokens already configured by administrators.

Published Updated Sources: cvelistV5, jenkins

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.

Exploitation

Unreported

no source claims exploitation

EPSS

0%

chance of exploitation in 30 days

Affects

Jenkins

jenkins_gitlab_plugin

CVSS base

5.4

MEDIUM

CISA SSVC assessment

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

CISA

Exploitation

None

none · proof-of-concept · active

Automatable

No

can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps

Technical impact

Partial

partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Affected scope

The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.

Vendors (1)

Jenkins

Products (1)

jenkins gitlab plugin

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactSource
5.4CVSS 3.1MEDIUM——cvelistV5

Weakness & attack patterns

  • CWE-494
  • CWE-471

Attack patterns reported against this CVE. The ATT&CK techniques below are inferred from its weakness class.

  • T1195.002Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain
  • T1072Software Deployment Tools
  • T1195.001Supply Chain Compromise: Software Dependencies and Development Tools

References

1 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

  • Jenkinsevery CVE for this vendor
  • CWE-494other pages naming this weakness

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.