CVE-2026-84869
CVE-2026-84869 — ScreenConnect Client: Guest-to-Host File Execution via File-Transfer Actions
A condition in the ScreenConnect client may allow files to be transferred and executed through an active remote session without authorization or Host confirmation in certain circumstances. ScreenConnect servers are not impacted.
Published Updated Sources: NVD, ConnectWise (CNA), CISA, FIRST EPSS, GitHub, GitHub Security Advisory, SOCRadar CTI
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.
Exploitation
Confirmed
CISA KEV, listed Sep 11, 2026
EPSS
0%
ahead of 32% of scored CVEs
CVSS base
9.9
critical
CISA SSVC assessment
Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.
Exploitation
Active
none · proof-of-concept · active
Automatable
No
can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps
Technical impact
Total
partial · total control of the vulnerable component
Remediation
The vendor's own words where we have them.
Cloud: Updated to the latest release. We recommend that partners reinstall their host clients https://docs.connectwise.com/ScreenConnect_Documentation/Get_started/Host_client/Reinstall_the_host_client and update their access agents https://docs.connectwise.com/ScreenConnect_Documentation/Get_started/Host_page/Reinstall_and_upgrade_an_access_agent . On-prem: Upgrade to ScreenConnect client version 26.6.5 or later. Automate-integrated ScreenConnect deployments: Automate partners are eligible to update their integrated on-premises ScreenConnect installation as long as their Automate Assurance su…
CISA required action
Apply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.
Federal deadline Sep 14, 2026 — in 2 days
First 24 hours
Ordered from the record's own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found.
- Identify exposed assets running affected vendor/product/version combinations.
- Treat as emergency remediation because CISA KEV status is present.
- Search available logs for exploit probes, errors, authentication anomalies, or suspicious child processes matching the vulnerability class.
Affected scope
Vendor, product and version as the advisories word them.
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| ConnectWise | ScreenConnect | All versions prior to 26.6.5 | Vulnerable |
Attack characteristics
The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.
Availability
High
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Scope
Changed
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Vector
Network
Privileges Req
Low
User Interaction
None
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.9 | CVSS 3.1 | critical | 3.1 | 6 | CNA, ConnectWise (CNA), GHSA |
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
What this weakness leads to
MITRE's own consequences and mitigations for the weakness class — the authority's wording, not guidance derived from the CVSS vector.
CWE-862 · Missing Authorization
- Read Application Data
- Read Files or Directories
- Modify Application Data
- Modify Files or Directories
Mitigation: Divide the software into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.
CWE-269 · Improper Privilege Management
- Gain Privileges or Assume Identity::
Mitigation: Very carefully manage the setting, management, and handling of privileges. Explicitly manage trust zones in the software.
Weakness & attack patterns
- CWE-862
- CWE-269Improper Privilege Management
Inferred from the weakness class — not observed against this CVE.
- T1211Exploitation for Defensive Evasion
- T1542.002Pre-OS Boot: Component Firmware
- T1556Modify Authentication Process
CISA KEV details
CISA lists a CVE here once it has evidence of exploitation against real targets.
Listed
Sep 11, 2026
Federal deadline
Sep 14, 2026
in 2 days
Ransomware use
Unknown
CISA records ransomware use only for campaigns it has confirmed, so “Unknown” means unrecorded, not ruled out. The deadline binds US federal agencies; for everyone else it is a date to argue against.
Public exploit
Capability, not use: code existing is a different claim from anyone running it.
Repositories
4
1 of the 4 sampled are weaponized
Detection
Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.
- Prioritize edge telemetry for network-reachable ScreenConnect.
- Monitor for scanner or exploit-pattern traffic after 4 public PoC repositories were reported.
Timeline
What happened to this CVE, newest first — with the readings a source repeats on a schedule counted underneath rather than listed.
- 2026
Added to CISA KEV catalog
Sep 11, 2026 · CISA
Added · CVSS 3.1 9.9 (AV:N)
Sep 11, 2026 · NVD
Initial · CVE published
Sep 8, 2026 · NVD
Added · GHSA-rc8v-f46m-jcgm published (critical)
Sep 8, 2026 · GitHub Security Advisory
CVE published by MITRE.
Sep 8, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI
Source activity
Readings a source repeats on a schedule, counted rather than listed.
- 6×ModifiedSep 8, 2026 – Sep 11, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI
- 1×1 time mentioned on 1 Telegram channelSep 10, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI
References
9 on the record
- github.com/ConnectWise-Advisories/Disclosures/tree/main/CVE-2026-84869
Third Party Advisory, NIST
- www.connectwise.com/company/trust/advisories
Vendor Advisory
- www.connectwise.com/company/trust/security-bulletins/2026-09-08-screenconnect-bulletin
Vendor Advisory
- www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-84869
US Government Resource
- www.huntress.com/blog/rogue-screenconnect-installations
Third Party Advisory
- nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-84869
NVD, Vendor Advisory
- github.com/advisories/GHSA-rc8v-f46m-jcgm
Exploit, Third Party Advisory
- www.cisa.gov/news-events/directives/bod-26-04-prioritizing-security-updates-based-risk
US Government Resource
Coverage
1 story from the feeds we poll
Elsewhere on this site
- ConnectWiseevery CVE for this vendor
- September 2026what else CISA listed
- Access Controlsame class
- CWE-862other pages naming this weakness
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record1
What should defenders know first?
CVE-2026-84869 is ScreenConnect Client: Guest-to-Host File Execution via File-Transfer Actions, a critical vulnerability affecting ScreenConnect from ConnectWise. The current evidence lists it in CISA KEV, and the exploit status is: Yes: CISA KEV signal present. Public exploit evidence is: 4 public PoC repositories reported; 1 marked weaponized in current dataset. The affected-version evidence is listed in the key facts and affected products tables. Defenders should first verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run those versions, then apply vendor patches or mitigations, restrict reachable attack surface, and preserve logs for detection review. CVSS 9.9 describes technical severity, while EPSS 0% helps estimate near-term exploit likelihood; neither replaces asset context. Unknown fields should remain explicit in tickets, and threat actor, IOC, victimology, or payload claims should not be added unless a cited source supports them. Monitor CISA KEV, vendor advisories, NVD changes, public PoC repositories, and internal telemetry for update triggers.