CVE-2026-85526
CVE-2026-85526 — Path traversal via Btrfs optimized-backup subvolumes[].path enables root file/dir manipulation in LXD
Path traversal in the Btrfs storage driver (unpackVolume) in Canonical LXD on Linux allows an authenticated user with instance creation privileges to delete or replace arbitrary files and directories on the host filesystem as root via a crafted subvolumes[].path entry in backup/optimized_header.yaml during a btrfs optimized backup import.
Published Updated Sources: NVD, Canonical (CNA), GitHub
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.
Exploitation
Exploit code
public exploit, none observed
EPSS
Not scored
FIRST has not published a score
CVSS base
9.9
critical
CISA SSVC assessment
Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.
Exploitation
PoC
none · proof-of-concept · active
Automatable
No
can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps
Technical impact
Total
partial · total control of the vulnerable component
Remediation
The vendor's own words where we have them.
Upgrade to LXD versions 4.0.14, 5.0.10, 5.21.8, 6.10 or later.
First 24 hours
Ordered from the record's own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found.
- Identify exposed assets running affected vendor/product/version combinations.
- Prioritize based on EPSS, PoC availability, and external exposure.
- Search available logs for exploit probes, errors, authentication anomalies, or suspicious child processes matching the vulnerability class.
Affected scope
Vendor, product and version as the advisories word them.
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canonical | LXD | 4.0.0 to < 4.0.14 | Vulnerable |
| Canonical | LXD | 5.0.0 to < 5.0.10 | Vulnerable |
| Canonical | LXD | 5.21.0 to < 5.21.8 | Vulnerable |
| Canonical | LXD | 6.0 to < 6.10 | Vulnerable |
Attack characteristics
The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.
Availability
High
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Scope
Changed
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Vector
Network
Privileges Req
Low
User Interaction
None
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.9 | CVSS 3.1 | critical | 3.1 | 6 | ubuntu.com (CNA), Canonical (CNA) |
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness & attack patterns
- CWE-22Path Traversal
Inferred from the weakness class — not observed against this CVE.
Public exploit
Capability, not use: code existing is a different claim from anyone running it.
Repositories
1
Detection
Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.
- Search application, proxy, and WAF logs for requests touching /optimized_header.yaml.
- Prioritize edge telemetry for network-reachable LXD.
- Monitor for scanner or exploit-pattern traffic after 1 public PoC repositories were reported.
Timeline
What happened to this CVE, newest first — with the readings a source repeats on a schedule counted underneath rather than listed.
- 2026
Added · CVSS 3.1 9.9 (AV:N)
Sep 28, 2026 · NVD
Initial · CVE published
Sep 28, 2026 · NVD
References
6 on the record
- github.com/canonical/lxd-private/pull/103
Exploit, Third Party Advisory
- github.com/canonical/lxd-private/pull/104
Exploit, Third Party Advisory
- github.com/canonical/lxd-private/pull/105
Exploit, Third Party Advisory
- github.com/canonical/lxd-private/pull/84
Exploit, Third Party Advisory
- github.com/canonical/lxd-private/pull/87
Exploit, Third Party Advisory
- github.com/canonical/lxd/security/advisories/GHSA-h85r-gjgx-g2rv
Exploit, Third Party Advisory
Elsewhere on this site
- Canonicalevery CVE for this vendor
- Path Traversalsame class
- CWE-22other pages naming this weakness
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record1
What should defenders know first?
CVE-2026-85526 is Path traversal via Btrfs optimized-backup subvolumes[].path enables root file/dir manipulation in LXD, a critical vulnerability affecting LXD from Canonical. The current evidence does not list it in CISA KEV, and the exploit status is: Active exploitation is not confirmed from current sources for CVE-2026-85526. Public exploit evidence is: 1 public PoC repositories reported; 0 marked weaponized in current dataset. The affected-version evidence is listed in the key facts and affected products tables. Defenders should first verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run those versions, then apply vendor patches or mitigations, restrict reachable attack surface, and preserve logs for detection review. CVSS 9.9 describes technical severity, while EPSS 0% helps estimate near-term exploit likelihood; neither replaces asset context. Unknown fields should remain explicit in tickets, and threat actor, IOC, victimology, or payload claims should not be added unless a cited source supports them. Monitor CISA KEV, vendor advisories, NVD changes, public PoC repositories, and internal telemetry for update triggers.