CVE-2026-91795
CVE-2026-91795 — Foxit PDF Editor/Reader FileOpen Uninitialized Variable Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
Foxit PDF Editor/Reader's FileOpen plugin did not adequately validate certain encryption metadata in specially crafted PDF files. This could leave an internal pointer in an invalid state, resulting in chained read and write access violations and potentially enabling arbitrary code execution.
Published Updated Sources: NVD, Foxit Software Inc. (CNA), GitHub
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.
Exploitation
Unreported
no source claims exploitation
EPSS
Not scored
FIRST has not published a score
CVSS base
7.8
high
Remediation
The vendor's own words where we have them.
Upgrade Foxit PDF Editor to a fixed release. Apply vendor patches per advisory and restrict external exposure of the affected component until patched.
First 24 hours
Ordered from the record's own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found.
- Identify exposed assets running affected vendor/product/version combinations.
- Prioritize based on EPSS, PoC availability, and external exposure.
- Search available logs for exploit probes, errors, authentication anomalies, or suspicious child processes matching the vulnerability class.
Affected scope
Vendor, product and version as the advisories word them.
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Foxit Software Inc. | Foxit PDF Editor | Versions 2026.2 and earlier | Vulnerable |
| Foxit Software Inc. | Foxit PDF Editor | Versions 14.0.7 and earlier | Vulnerable |
| Foxit Software Inc. | Foxit PDF Editor | Versions 13.2.6 and earlier | Vulnerable |
| Foxit Software Inc. | Foxit PDF Reader | Versions 2026.2 and earlier | Vulnerable |
Attack characteristics
The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.
Availability
High
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Scope
Unchanged
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Vector
Local
Privileges Req
None
User Interaction
Required
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.8 | CVSS 3.1 | high | 1.8 | 5.9 | CNA, Foxit Software Inc. (CNA) |
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness & attack patterns
- CWE-822
Inferred from the weakness class — not observed against this CVE.
Detection
Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.
- Search application, proxy, and WAF logs for requests touching /Reader's.
Timeline
What happened to this CVE, newest first — with the readings a source repeats on a schedule counted underneath rather than listed.
- 2026
Added · CVSS 3.1 7.8 (AV:L)
Sep 23, 2026 · NVD
Initial · CVE published
Sep 23, 2026 · NVD
References
1 on the record
- www.foxit.com/support/security-bulletins.html
Vendor Advisory
Elsewhere on this site
- Foxit Software Inc.every CVE for this vendor
- Remote Code Execsame class
- CWE-822other pages naming this weakness
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record1
What should defenders know first?
CVE-2026-91795 is Foxit PDF Editor/Reader FileOpen Uninitialized Variable Remote Code Execution Vulnerability, a high vulnerability affecting Foxit PDF Editor, Foxit PDF Reader from Foxit Software Inc.. The current evidence does not list it in CISA KEV, and the exploit status is: Active exploitation is not confirmed from current sources for CVE-2026-91795. Public exploit evidence is: A public PoC is not confirmed from current sources for CVE-2026-91795. The affected-version evidence is listed in the key facts and affected products tables. Defenders should first verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run those versions, then apply vendor patches or mitigations, restrict reachable attack surface, and preserve logs for detection review. CVSS 7.8 describes technical severity, while EPSS 0% helps estimate near-term exploit likelihood; neither replaces asset context. Unknown fields should remain explicit in tickets, and threat actor, IOC, victimology, or payload claims should not be added unless a cited source supports them. Monitor CISA KEV, vendor advisories, NVD changes, public PoC repositories, and internal telemetry for update triggers.