CVE-2026-92235
CVE-2026-92235 — WP Ultimate Review <= 2.4.2 - Authenticated (Subscriber+) Arbitrary Shortcode Execution via 'xs_submit_review_data[xs_reviw_summery]' Parameter
The The WP Ultimate Review plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary shortcode execution in all versions up to, and including, 2.4.2. This is due to the software allowing users to execute an action that does not properly validate a value before running do_shortcode. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to execute arbitrary shortcodes.
Published Updated Sources: NVD, roxnor (CNA), GitHub, GitHub Security Advisory, SOCRadar CTI
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.
Exploitation
Exploit code
public exploit, none observed
EPSS
0%
ahead of 0% of scored CVEs
CVSS base
8.1
high
Remediation
The vendor's own words where we have them.
Upgrade WP Ultimate Review to a fixed release. Apply vendor patches per advisory and restrict external exposure of the affected component until patched.
First 24 hours
Ordered from the record's own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found.
- Identify exposed assets running affected vendor/product/version combinations.
- Prioritize based on EPSS, PoC availability, and external exposure.
- Search available logs for exploit probes, errors, authentication anomalies, or suspicious child processes matching the vulnerability class.
Affected scope
Vendor, product and version as the advisories word them.
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| roxnor | WP Ultimate Review | 0 to <= 2.4.2 | Vulnerable |
Attack characteristics
The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.
Availability
None
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Scope
Unchanged
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Vector
Network
Privileges Req
Low
User Interaction
None
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.1 | CVSS 3.1 | high | 2.8 | 5.2 | NVD, roxnor (CNA), GHSA |
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
What this weakness leads to
MITRE's own consequences and mitigations for the weakness class — the authority's wording, not guidance derived from the CVSS vector.
CWE-94 · Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')
- Bypass Protection Mechanism
- Gain Privileges or Assume Identity
- Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
- Hide Activities
Mitigation: Refactor your program so that you do not have to dynamically generate code.
Weakness & attack patterns
- CWE-94Code Injection
Attack patterns reported against this CVE. The ATT&CK techniques below are inferred from its weakness class.
- T1027.006Obfuscated Files or Information: HTML Smuggling
- T1027.009Obfuscated Files or Information: Embedded Payloads
- T1564.009Hide Artifacts: Resource Forking
Public exploit
Capability, not use: code existing is a different claim from anyone running it.
Repositories
1
Detection
Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.
- Prioritize edge telemetry for network-reachable WP Ultimate Review.
- Monitor for scanner or exploit-pattern traffic after 1 public PoC repositories were reported.
Timeline
What happened to this CVE, newest first — with the readings a source repeats on a schedule counted underneath rather than listed.
- 2026
Added · CVSS 3.1 8.1 (AV:N)
Sep 22, 2026 · NVD
Initial · CVE published
Sep 22, 2026 · NVD
Added · GHSA-gg2m-8p7j-v3mx published (high)
Sep 22, 2026 · GitHub Security Advisory
CVE published by MITRE.
Sep 22, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI
Reported · Disclosed
Sep 21, 2026 · roxnor
Reported · Vendor Notified
Sep 15, 2026 · roxnor
Source activity
Readings a source repeats on a schedule, counted rather than listed.
- 1×2 times mentioned on 1 Telegram channelsSep 22, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI
References
10 on the record
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wp-ultimate-review/tags/2.4.2/app/content.php#L189
Vendor Advisory
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wp-ultimate-review/tags/2.4.2/app/content.php#L341
Vendor Advisory
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wp-ultimate-review/tags/2.4.2/app/content.php#L360
Vendor Advisory
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wp-ultimate-review/tags/2.4.2/app/content.php#L56
Vendor Advisory
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wp-ultimate-review/tags/2.4.2/init.php#L271
Vendor Advisory
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org/browser/wp-ultimate-review/tags/2.4.2/views/public/meta-box-user-review.php#L538
Vendor Advisory
- plugins.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?reponame=&old=3703958%40wp-ultimate-review&new=3703958%40wp-ultimate-review
Vendor Advisory
- www.wordfence.com/threat-intel/vulnerabilities/id/dc0fe855-97b7-46ef-b1c8-1602447e97e6?source=cve
Vendor Advisory
Elsewhere on this site
- roxnorevery CVE for this vendor
- Remote Code Execsame class
- CWE-94other pages naming this weakness
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record1
What should defenders know first?
CVE-2026-92235 is WP Ultimate Review <= 2.4.2 - Authenticated (Subscriber+) Arbitrary Shortcode Execution via 'xs_submit_review_data[xs_reviw_summery]' Parameter, a high vulnerability affecting WP Ultimate Review from roxnor. The current evidence does not list it in CISA KEV, and the exploit status is: Active exploitation is not confirmed from current sources for CVE-2026-92235. Public exploit evidence is: 1 public PoC repositories reported; 0 marked weaponized in current dataset. The affected-version evidence is listed in the key facts and affected products tables. Defenders should first verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run those versions, then apply vendor patches or mitigations, restrict reachable attack surface, and preserve logs for detection review. CVSS 8.1 describes technical severity, while EPSS 0% helps estimate near-term exploit likelihood; neither replaces asset context. Unknown fields should remain explicit in tickets, and threat actor, IOC, victimology, or payload claims should not be added unless a cited source supports them. Monitor CISA KEV, vendor advisories, NVD changes, public PoC repositories, and internal telemetry for update triggers.