CVE-2026-92397
CVE-2026-92397 — Ruijie RG-EW3000GX configChange unifyframe-sgi.elf cc_set os command injection
A vulnerability has been found in Ruijie RG-EW3000GX EW_3.0(1)B11P380. Affected by this vulnerability is the function cc_set of the file unifyframe-sgi.elf of the component configChange. Such manipulation of the argument data.url leads to os command injection. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
Published Updated Sources: cvelistV5, VulDB
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.
Exploitation
Unreported
no source claims exploitation
EPSS
2%
chance of exploitation in 30 days
CVSS base
9.1
CRITICAL
CISA SSVC assessment
Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.
Exploitation
PoC
none · proof-of-concept · active
Automatable
No
can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps
Technical impact
Total
partial · total control of the vulnerable component
Affected scope
The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.
Vendors (1)
Products (1)
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.1 | CVSS 3.1 | CRITICAL | — | — | cvelistV5 |
Weakness & attack patterns
- CWE-78
- CWE-77
References
5 on the record
- vuldb.com/vuln/405549
vdb-entry, technical-description
- vuldb.com/vuln/405549/cti
signature, permissions-required
- vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-92397
third-party-advisory
- vuldb.com/submit/940161
third-party-advisory
- github.com/FoundTL/RG-EW3000GX/blob/main/RG-EW3000GX_unifyframe-sgi.elf.md
exploit
Elsewhere on this site
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.