CVE Intelligence
Skip to main content
highpublic exploit

CVE-2026-93495

CVE-2026-93495 — Improper initialization in an ASUS certain motherboard allows an physically proximate user to read or write arbitrary memory by inserting a…

Improper initialization in an ASUS certain motherboard allows an physically proximate user to read or write arbitrary memory by inserting a specially crafted device.

Published Updated Sources: NVD, ASUS (CNA), GitHub, GitHub Security Advisory, SOCRadar CTI

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.

Exploitation

Exploit code

public exploit, none observed

EPSS

0%

ahead of 0% of scored CVEs

Affects

ASUS

13 products listed

CVSS base

7

high

Remediation

The vendor's own words where we have them.

Upgrade Motherboard(PRIME Z390-A ) to a fixed release. Apply vendor patches per advisory and restrict external exposure of the affected component until patched.

First 24 hours

Ordered from the record's own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found.

  • Identify exposed assets running affected vendor/product/version combinations.
  • Prioritize based on EPSS, PoC availability, and external exposure.
  • Search available logs for exploit probes, errors, authentication anomalies, or suspicious child processes matching the vulnerability class.

Affected scope

Vendor, product and version as the advisories word them.

VendorProductVersionsStatus
ASUSMotherboard(PRIME Z390-A )through 2101Vulnerable
ASUSMotherboard(PRIME Z390-A/H10 )through 2101Vulnerable
ASUSMotherboard(ROG MAXIMUS XI HERO )through 2101Vulnerable
ASUSMotherboard(ROG MAXIMUS XI HERO (WI-FI) )through 2101Vulnerable
ASUSMotherboard(ROG MAXIMUS XI FORMULA )through 2101Vulnerable
ASUSMotherboard(ROG MAXIMUS XI CODE )through 2101Vulnerable
ASUSMotherboard(ROG MAXIMUS XI EXTREME )through 2101Vulnerable
ASUSMotherboard(ROG MAXIMUS XI APEX )through 2101Vulnerable
ASUSMotherboard(ROG MAXIMUS XI GENE )through 2101Vulnerable
ASUSMotherboard(ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING )through 2101Vulnerable
ASUSMotherboard(ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING )through 2101Vulnerable
ASUSMotherboard(Pro WS C246-ACE )through 2101Vulnerable

Attack characteristics

The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.

Scope

X

Attack Complexity

Low

Attack Vector

Physical

Privileges Req

None

User Interaction

None

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactSource
7CVSS 4.0high——ASUS (CNA)

CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

What this weakness leads to

MITRE's own consequences and mitigations for the weakness class — the authority's wording, not guidance derived from the CVSS vector.

MITRE

CWE-665 · Improper Initialization

  • Read Memory
  • Read Application Data
  • Bypass Protection Mechanism
  • DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart

Mitigation: Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, in Java, if the programmer does not explicitly initialize a variable, then the code could produce a compile-time error (if the variable is local) or automatically initialize the variable to the default value for the variable's type. In Perl, if explicit initialization is not performed, then a default value of undef is assigned, which is interpreted as 0, false, or an equivalent value depending on the context in which the variable is accessed.

Weakness & attack patterns

  • CWE-665

Attack patterns reported against this CVE. The ATT&CK techniques below are inferred from its weakness class.

CAPEC-26 · Leveraging Race ConditionsCAPEC-29 · Leveraging Time-of-Check and Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) Race Conditions

Public exploit

Capability, not use: code existing is a different claim from anyone running it.

Repositories

1

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.

  • Monitor for scanner or exploit-pattern traffic after 1 public PoC repositories were reported.

Timeline

What happened to this CVE, newest first — with the readings a source repeats on a schedule counted underneath rather than listed.

  1. 2026
  2. Added · CVSS 3.1 7.0 (AV:P)

    Oct 1, 2026 · NVD

  3. Initial · CVE published

    Oct 1, 2026 · NVD

  4. Added · GHSA-4pjr-762p-4q8c published (high)

    Oct 1, 2026 · GitHub Security Advisory

  5. CVE published by NIST.

    Oct 1, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI

References

3 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record1

What should defenders know first?

CVE-2026-93495 is Improper initialization in an ASUS certain motherboard allows an physically proximate user to read or write arbitrary memory by inserting a…, a high vulnerability affecting Motherboard(PRIME Z390-A ), Motherboard(PRIME Z390-A/H10 ), Motherboard(ROG MAXIMUS XI HERO ), Motherboard(ROG MAXIMUS XI HERO (WI-FI) ), Motherboard(ROG MAXIMUS XI FORMULA ), Motherboard(ROG MAXIMUS XI CODE ), Motherboard(ROG MAXIMUS XI EXTREME ), Motherboard(ROG MAXIMUS XI APEX ), Motherboard(ROG MAXIMUS XI GENE ), Motherboard(ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING ), Motherboard(ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING ), Motherboard(Pro WS C246-ACE ), Motherboard(WS Z390 PRO ) from ASUS. The current evidence does not list it in CISA KEV, and the exploit status is: Active exploitation is not confirmed from current sources for CVE-2026-93495. Public exploit evidence is: 1 public PoC repositories reported; 0 marked weaponized in current dataset. The affected-version evidence is listed in the key facts and affected products tables. Defenders should first verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run those versions, then apply vendor patches or mitigations, restrict reachable attack surface, and preserve logs for detection review. CVSS 7 describes technical severity, while EPSS 0% helps estimate near-term exploit likelihood; neither replaces asset context. Unknown fields should remain explicit in tickets, and threat actor, IOC, victimology, or payload claims should not be added unless a cited source supports them. Monitor CISA KEV, vendor advisories, NVD changes, public PoC repositories, and internal telemetry for update triggers.