CVE Intelligence
Skip to main content
CISA KEVcriticalInput Validationpublic exploit

CVE-2026-93952

CVE-2026-93952 — Security Advisory 0183

VeloCloud Orchestrator (VCO) on-prem has a security issue where this issue may allow a remote attacker to access privileged internal functionality and impact the VCO host. Successful exploitation may compromise the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the orchestrator and data managed by the orchestrator. Hosted, including Dedicated, versions of VCO were impacted and have already been patched.

Published Updated Sources: NVD, Arista Networks (CNA), CISA, FIRST EPSS, GitHub, GitHub Security Advisory, SOCRadar CTI

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.

Exploitation

Confirmed

CISA KEV, listed Sep 22, 2026

EPSS

1%

ahead of 53% of scored CVEs

Affects

Arista Networks

4 products listed

CVSS base

10

critical · 2 sources

CISA SSVC assessment

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

CISA

Exploitation

Active

none · proof-of-concept · active

Automatable

Yes

can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps

Technical impact

Total

partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Remediation

The vendor's own words where we have them.

The recommended resolution is to upgrade to a remediated VCO software version at your earliest convenience. These vulnerabilities have been fixed in the following releases: - VCO 5.2.3.16 and later in the 5.2.3 train - VCO 6.4.2.8 and later in the 6.4.2 train Releases in other release trains that fix this will be added over time. For VCOs not on a supported release train, customers can contact TAC to discuss possible upgrade options.

CISA required action

Apply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Federal deadline Sep 25, 2026 — in 1 day

First 24 hours

Ordered from the record's own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found.

  • Identify exposed assets running affected vendor/product/version combinations.
  • Treat as emergency remediation because CISA KEV status is present.
  • Search available logs for exploit probes, errors, authentication anomalies, or suspicious child processes matching the vulnerability class.

Affected scope

Vendor, product and version as the advisories word them.

VendorProductVersionsStatus
Arista NetworksVeloCloud Orchestrator (VCO) On-Prem5.2.0 to <= 5.2.3.15Vulnerable
Arista NetworksVeloCloud Orchestrator (VCO) On-Prem6.1.0 to <= 6.1.3.7Vulnerable
Arista NetworksVeloCloud Orchestrator (VCO) On-Prem6.4.0 to <= 6.4.2.7Vulnerable
Arista NetworksVeloCloud Orchestrator (VCO) On-Prem7.0.0 to <= 7.0.0.2Vulnerable

Attack characteristics

The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.

Availability

High

Confidentiality

High

Integrity

High

Scope

Changed

Attack Complexity

Low

Attack Vector

Network

Privileges Req

None

User Interaction

None

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactSource
10CVSS 3.1critical3.96Arista Networks (CNA), GHSA
9.5CVSS 4.0critical——Arista Networks (CNA)

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

What this weakness leads to

MITRE's own consequences and mitigations for the weakness class — the authority's wording, not guidance derived from the CVSS vector.

MITRE

CWE-20 · Improper Input Validation

  • DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart
  • DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU)
  • DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory)
  • Read Memory

Mitigation: Consider using language-theoretic security (LangSec) techniques that characterize inputs using a formal language and build recognizers for that language. This effectively requires parsing to be a distinct layer that effectively enforces a boundary between raw input and internal data representations, instead of allowing parser code to be scattered throughout the program, where it could be subject to errors or inconsistencies that create weaknesses. [REF-1109] [REF-1110] [REF-1111]

Weakness & attack patterns

  • CWE-20Improper Input Validation

Attack patterns reported against this CVE. The ATT&CK techniques below are inferred from its weakness class.

CAPEC-67 · String Format Overflow in syslog()CAPEC-261 · Fuzzing for garnering other adjacent user/sensitive dataCAPEC-182 · Flash InjectionCAPEC-267 · Leverage Alternate EncodingCAPEC-71 · Using Unicode Encoding to Bypass Validation LogicCAPEC-46 · Overflow Variables and TagsCAPEC-83 · XPath InjectionCAPEC-22 · Exploiting Trust in ClientCAPEC-3 · Using Leading 'Ghost' Character Sequences to Bypass Input FiltersCAPEC-13 · Subverting Environment Variable ValuesCAPEC-8 · Buffer Overflow in an API CallCAPEC-250 · XML Injection
  • T1562.003Impair Defenses: Impair Command History Logging
  • T1574.006Hijack Execution Flow: Dynamic Linker Hijacking
  • T1574.007Hijack Execution Flow: Path Interception by PATH Environment Variable

CISA KEV details

CISA lists a CVE here once it has evidence of exploitation against real targets.

Listed

Sep 22, 2026

Federal deadline

Sep 25, 2026

in 1 day

Ransomware use

Unknown

CISA records ransomware use only for campaigns it has confirmed, so “Unknown” means unrecorded, not ruled out. The deadline binds US federal agencies; for everyone else it is a date to argue against.

Public exploit

Capability, not use: code existing is a different claim from anyone running it.

Repositories

1

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.

  • Prioritize edge telemetry for network-reachable VeloCloud Orchestrator (VCO) On-Prem.
  • Monitor for scanner or exploit-pattern traffic after 1 public PoC repositories were reported.
web/proxy/WAF logsapplication logsnetwork IDS/IPS

Timeline

What happened to this CVE, newest first — with the readings a source repeats on a schedule counted underneath rather than listed.

  1. 2026
  2. Added to CISA KEV catalog

    Sep 22, 2026 · CISA

  3. Added · CVSS 3.1 10.0 (AV:N)

    Sep 22, 2026 · NVD

  4. Initial · CVE published

    Sep 22, 2026 · NVD

  5. Added · GHSA-fqhw-f6hf-cq3w published (critical)

    Sep 22, 2026 · GitHub Security Advisory

  6. CVE published by MITRE.

    Sep 22, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI

Source activity

Readings a source repeats on a schedule, counted rather than listed.

  • 1×2 times mentioned on 1 Telegram channelsSep 22, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI

References

6 on the record

Coverage

1 story from the feeds we poll

Elsewhere on this site

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record1

What should defenders know first?

CVE-2026-93952 is Security Advisory 0183, a critical vulnerability affecting VeloCloud Orchestrator (VCO) On-Prem from Arista Networks. The current evidence lists it in CISA KEV, and the exploit status is: Yes: CISA KEV signal present. Public exploit evidence is: 1 public PoC repositories reported; 0 marked weaponized in current dataset. The affected-version evidence is listed in the key facts and affected products tables. Defenders should first verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run those versions, then apply vendor patches or mitigations, restrict reachable attack surface, and preserve logs for detection review. CVSS 10 describes technical severity, while EPSS 1% helps estimate near-term exploit likelihood; neither replaces asset context. Unknown fields should remain explicit in tickets, and threat actor, IOC, victimology, or payload claims should not be added unless a cited source supports them. Monitor CISA KEV, vendor advisories, NVD changes, public PoC repositories, and internal telemetry for update triggers.