CVE Intelligence
Skip to main content
CISA KEVmedium

CVE-2023-36584

CVE-2023-36584 — Microsoft Windows Mark of the Web (MOTW) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability

Windows Mark of the Web Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability

Published Updated Sources: NVD, CISA, FIRST EPSS

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.

Exploitation

Confirmed

CISA KEV, listed Nov 16, 2023

EPSS

3%

ahead of 87% of scored CVEs

Affects

microsoft

20 products listed

CVSS base

5.4

medium

CISA SSVC assessment

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

CISA

Exploitation

Active

none · proof-of-concept · active

Automatable

No

can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps

Technical impact

Total

partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Remediation

The vendor's own words where we have them.

Upgrade windows_10_version_1809 to a fixed release. Apply vendor patches per advisory and restrict external exposure of the affected component until patched.

CISA required action

Apply mitigations per vendor instructions or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.

Federal deadline Dec 7, 2023 — passed 1,016 days ago

First 24 hours

Ordered from the record's own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found.

  • Identify exposed assets running affected vendor/product/version combinations.
  • Treat as emergency remediation because CISA KEV status is present.
  • Search available logs for exploit probes, errors, authentication anomalies, or suspicious child processes matching the vulnerability class.

Affected scope

Vendor, product and version as the advisories word them.

VendorProductVersionsStatus
microsoftwindows_10_version_1809Vulnerable
microsoftwindows_server_2019Vulnerable
microsoftwindows_server_2019_server_core_installationVulnerable
microsoftwindows_server_2022Vulnerable
microsoftwindows_11_version_21h2Vulnerable
microsoftwindows_10_version_21h2Vulnerable
microsoftwindows_11_version_22h2Vulnerable
microsoftwindows_10_version_22h2Vulnerable
microsoftwindows_10_version_1507Vulnerable
microsoftwindows_10_version_1607Vulnerable
microsoftwindows_server_2016Vulnerable
microsoftwindows_server_2016_server_core_installationVulnerable

Attack characteristics

The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.

Availability

Low

Confidentiality

None

Integrity

Low

Scope

Unchanged

Attack Complexity

Low

Attack Vector

Network

Privileges Req

None

User Interaction

Required

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactSource
5.4CVSS 3.1medium2.82.5Microsoft (CNA)

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

CISA KEV details

CISA lists a CVE here once it has evidence of exploitation against real targets.

Listed

Nov 16, 2023

Federal deadline

Dec 7, 2023

passed 1,016 days ago

Ransomware use

Unknown

CISA records ransomware use only for campaigns it has confirmed, so “Unknown” means unrecorded, not ruled out. The deadline binds US federal agencies; for everyone else it is a date to argue against.

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.

  • Prioritize edge telemetry for network-reachable windows_10_version_1809, windows_server_2019, windows_server_2019_server_core_installation, windows_server_2022, windows_11_version_21h2, windows_10_version_21h2, windows_11_version_22h2, windows_10_version_22h2, windows_10_version_1507, windows_10_version_1607, windows_server_2016, windows_server_2016_server_core_installation, windows_server_2008_service_pack_2, windows_server_2008_service_pack_2_server_core_installation, windows_server_2008_r2_service_pack_1, windows_server_2008_r2_service_pack_1_server_core_installation, windows_server_2012, windows_server_2012_server_core_installation, windows_server_2012_r2, windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation.
web/proxy/WAF logsapplication logsnetwork IDS/IPS

Timeline

What happened to this CVE, newest first — with the readings a source repeats on a schedule counted underneath rather than listed.

  1. 2026
  2. Added · CVSS 3.1 5.4 (AV:N)

    Jun 17, 2026 · NVD

  3. 2023
  4. Added to CISA KEV catalog

    Nov 16, 2023 · CISA

  5. Initial · CVE published

    Oct 10, 2023 · NVD

References

3 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record1

What should defenders know first?

CVE-2023-36584 is Microsoft Windows Mark of the Web (MOTW) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability, a medium vulnerability affecting windows_10_version_1809, windows_server_2019, windows_server_2019_server_core_installation, windows_server_2022, windows_11_version_21h2, windows_10_version_21h2, windows_11_version_22h2, windows_10_version_22h2, windows_10_version_1507, windows_10_version_1607, windows_server_2016, windows_server_2016_server_core_installation, windows_server_2008_service_pack_2, windows_server_2008_service_pack_2_server_core_installation, windows_server_2008_r2_service_pack_1, windows_server_2008_r2_service_pack_1_server_core_installation, windows_server_2012, windows_server_2012_server_core_installation, windows_server_2012_r2, windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation from microsoft. The current evidence lists it in CISA KEV, and the exploit status is: Yes: CISA KEV signal present. Public exploit evidence is: A public PoC is not confirmed from current sources for CVE-2023-36584. The affected-version evidence is listed in the key facts and affected products tables. Defenders should first verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run those versions, then apply vendor patches or mitigations, restrict reachable attack surface, and preserve logs for detection review. CVSS 5.4 describes technical severity, while EPSS 3% helps estimate near-term exploit likelihood; neither replaces asset context. Unknown fields should remain explicit in tickets, and threat actor, IOC, victimology, or payload claims should not be added unless a cited source supports them. Monitor CISA KEV, vendor advisories, NVD changes, public PoC repositories, and internal telemetry for update triggers.