What is CVE-2026-33824?

CVE-2026-33824 is Windows Internet Key Exchange (IKE) Service Extensions Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. The supplied enrichment data classifies it as Memory Corruption mapped to CWE-415 CWE-415.

Which versions are affected?

Affected product and version evidence is listed in the product table above. Current public advisories should be checked for exact version scope before patch targeting is finalized.

Is there active exploitation?

Yes: CISA KEV signal present. If exploitation is not confirmed from current sources, teams should document that status and continue monitoring KEV, vendor, and telemetry updates.

Is there a public exploit?

4 public PoC repositories reported; 2 marked weaponized in current dataset. Public exploit or PoC availability should raise triage priority, especially for exposed or business-critical systems.

How can defenders detect it?

Start with web/proxy/WAF logs, application logs, network IDS/IPS where available. Look for vulnerability-class behavior, product errors, suspicious authentication events, exploit probes, and abnormal process activity based only on evidence that applies to the affected product.

How should teams prioritize it?

Prioritize CVE-2026-33824 using CVSS 9.8, EPSS 73%, KEV status, public PoC status, and asset exposure. Internet-facing, privileged, or business-critical deployments should be handled first.

Are workarounds available?

The supplied mitigation guidance says to apply vendor patches and restrict external exposure until fixed. Fixed-version evidence is listed in the mitigation section above.

Which threat actors are linked publicly?

Publicly linked actor or ransomware signals in the supplied enrichment data: COBALT DICKENS (). Do not attribute exploitation to a threat actor unless the source evidence explicitly supports that linkage.

What should be done in the next 24 hours?

Identify exposed assets running affected vendor/product/version combinations. Treat as emergency remediation because CISA KEV status is present. Search available logs for exploit probes, errors, authentication anomalies, or suspicious child processes matching the vulnerability class. Open remediation tickets with affected assets, owners, evidence status, and detection coverage so decisions are traceable.

CISA KEVcriticalMemory Corruptionpublic exploit

CVE-2026-33824

CVE-2026-33824 — Windows Internet Key Exchange (IKE) Service Extensions Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

Q: Is it in CISA KEV?

Yes. The supplied enrichment data lists CVE-2026-33824 in CISA KEV with required action: Apply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.. KEV status should be monitored because it can change after initial disclosure or after exploitation becomes publicly confirmed.

Double free in Windows IKE Extension allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

Published Apr 14, 2026Updated Aug 19, 2026Sources: NVD, Microsoft (CNA), CISA, FIRST EPSS, SOCRadar CTI

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.

Exploitation

Confirmed

CISA KEV, listed Aug 18, 2026

EPSS

73%

ahead of 99.4% of scored CVEs

Affects

Microsoft

17 products listed

CVSS base

9.8

critical · 2 sources

CISA SSVC assessment

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

CISA

Exploitation

Active

none · proof-of-concept · active

Automatable

Yes

can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps

Technical impact

Total

partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Remediation

The vendor's own words where we have them.

Upgrade Windows 10 Version 1607 to a fixed release. Apply vendor patches per advisory and restrict external exposure of the affected component until patched.

CISA required action

Apply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Federal deadline Aug 21, 2026 — passed 9 days ago

First 24 hours

Ordered from the record's own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found.

Identify exposed assets running affected vendor/product/version combinations.
Treat as emergency remediation because CISA KEV status is present.
Search available logs for exploit probes, errors, authentication anomalies, or suspicious child processes matching the vulnerability class.

Affected scope

Vendor, product and version as the advisories word them.

Vendor	Product	Versions	Status
Microsoft	Windows 10 Version 1607	10.0.14393.0 to < 10.0.14393.9060	Vulnerable
Microsoft	Windows 10 Version 1809	10.0.17763.0 to < 10.0.17763.8644	Vulnerable
Microsoft	Windows 10 Version 21H2	10.0.19044.0 to < 10.0.19044.7184	Vulnerable
Microsoft	Windows 10 Version 22H2	10.0.19045.0 to < 10.0.19045.7184	Vulnerable
Microsoft	Windows 11 version 22H3	10.0.22631.0 to < 10.0.22631.6936	Vulnerable
Microsoft	Windows 11 Version 23H2	10.0.22631.0 to < 10.0.22631.6936	Vulnerable
Microsoft	Windows 11 Version 24H2	10.0.26100.0 to < 10.0.26100.8246	Vulnerable
Microsoft	Windows 11 Version 25H2	10.0.26200.0 to < 10.0.26200.8246	Vulnerable
Microsoft	Windows 11 version 26H1	10.0.28000.0 to < 10.0.28000.1836	Vulnerable
Microsoft	Windows Server 2016	10.0.14393.0 to < 10.0.14393.9060	Vulnerable
Microsoft	Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)	10.0.14393.0 to < 10.0.14393.9060	Vulnerable
Microsoft	Windows Server 2019	10.0.17763.0 to < 10.0.17763.8644	Vulnerable

Attack characteristics

The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.

Availability

High

Confidentiality

High

Integrity

High

Scope

Unchanged

Attack Complexity

Low

Attack Vector

Network

Privileges Req

None

User Interaction

None

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

Score	Version	Severity	Expl.	Impact	Source
9.8	CVSS 3.1	critical	3.9	5.9	Microsoft (CNA)
9.8	CVSS 3.1	critical	—	—	Microsoft (CNA)

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

What this weakness leads to

MITRE's own consequences and mitigations for the weakness class — the authority's wording, not guidance derived from the CVSS vector.

MITRE

CWE-415 · Double Free

Modify Memory
Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands

Mitigation: Choose a language that provides automatic memory management.

Weakness & attack patterns

CWE-415

Inferred from the weakness class — not observed against this CVE.

CAPEC-100 · Overflow BuffersCAPEC-123 · Buffer Manipulation

CISA KEV details

CISA lists a CVE here once it has evidence of exploitation against real targets.

CISAThat month →

Listed

Aug 18, 2026

Federal deadline

Aug 21, 2026

passed 9 days ago

Ransomware use

Unknown

CISA records ransomware use only for campaigns it has confirmed, so “Unknown” means unrecorded, not ruled out. The deadline binds US federal agencies; for everyone else it is a date to argue against.

Public exploit

Capability, not use: code existing is a different claim from anyone running it.

Repositories

2 of the 3 sampled are weaponized

Exploit entries

Exploit-DB and CTI exploit indexes

Social mentions

Posts naming this CVE. Attention, not evidence of exploitation — it spikes on disclosure and decays whether or not anything is exploited.

35 more posts on this CVEShowing 5 of 40 · Who is discussing this CVE, and how loudlyUnlock free

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.

Prioritize edge telemetry for network-reachable Windows 10 Version 1607, Windows 10 Version 1809, Windows 10 Version 21H2, Windows 10 Version 22H2, Windows 11 version 22H3, Windows 11 Version 23H2, Windows 11 Version 24H2, Windows 11 Version 25H2, Windows 11 version 26H1, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation), Windows Server 2019, Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation), Windows Server 2022, Windows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation), Windows Server 2025, Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation).
Monitor for scanner or exploit-pattern traffic after 4 public PoC repositories were reported.

web/proxy/WAF logsapplication logsnetwork IDS/IPS

Groups associated with this CVE

Groups reported in connection with this vulnerability. A reported association, not a confirmed observation of that group using it — and not scoped to any sector or campaign.

COBALT DICKENS

Timeline

What happened to this CVE, newest first — with the readings a source repeats on a schedule counted underneath rather than listed.

2026
Added · CVSS 3.1 9.8 (AV:N)
Aug 19, 2026 · NVD
Added to CISA KEV catalog
Aug 18, 2026 · CISA
Cve is exploited EpSiLoNPoInTOrI/IKEV2-POC
May 18, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI
Initial · CVE published
Apr 14, 2026 · NVD

Source activity

Readings a source repeats on a schedule, counted rather than listed.

20×SVRS was changedMay 18, 2026 – Aug 29, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI
12×TweetsAug 6, 2026 – Aug 29, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI
4×ModifiedJul 24, 2026 – Aug 18, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI
2×TelegramJun 9, 2026 – Aug 25, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI

References

7 on the record

msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33824
Vendor Advisory, NIST, Mitre
unit42.paloaltonetworks.com/autonomous-ai-cyber-attack-campaign/
Third Party Advisory, NIST, GITHUB
www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-33824
US Government Resource, NIST
msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2026-33824
Vendor Advisory
www.cisa.gov/news-events/directives/bod-26-04-prioritizing-security-updates-based-risk
US Government Resource
www.cisa.gov/news-events/directives/bod-26-04-implementation-guidance-prioritizing-security-updates-based-risk
US Government Resource
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33824
Vendor Advisory

Coverage

20 stories from the feeds we poll

15 more reports on this CVEShowing 5 of 20 · Vendor research and security press coverageUnlock free

Elsewhere on this site

Microsoftevery CVE for this vendor
August 2026what else CISA listed
Memory Corruptionsame class
CWE-415other pages naming this weakness

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.

Answered from this record1

What should defenders know first?

CVE-2026-33824 is Windows Internet Key Exchange (IKE) Service Extensions Remote Code Execution Vulnerability, a critical vulnerability affecting Windows 10 Version 1607, Windows 10 Version 1809, Windows 10 Version 21H2, Windows 10 Version 22H2, Windows 11 version 22H3, Windows 11 Version 23H2, Windows 11 Version 24H2, Windows 11 Version 25H2, Windows 11 version 26H1, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation), Windows Server 2019, Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation), Windows Server 2022, Windows Server 2022, 23H2 Edition (Server Core installation), Windows Server 2025, Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) from Microsoft. The current evidence lists it in CISA KEV, and the exploit status is: Yes: CISA KEV signal present. Public exploit evidence is: 4 public PoC repositories reported; 2 marked weaponized in current dataset. The affected-version evidence is listed in the key facts and affected products tables. Defenders should first verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run those versions, then apply vendor patches or mitigations, restrict reachable attack surface, and preserve logs for detection review. CVSS 9.8 describes technical severity, while EPSS 73% helps estimate near-term exploit likelihood; neither replaces asset context. Unknown fields should remain explicit in tickets, and threat actor, IOC, victimology, or payload claims should not be added unless a cited source supports them. Monitor CISA KEV, vendor advisories, NVD changes, public PoC repositories, and internal telemetry for update triggers.