CVE Intelligence
Skip to main content
CISA KEVcriticalRemote Code Execpublic exploit

CVE-2026-39808

Fortinet FortiSandbox OS Command Injection Vulnerability

A improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('os command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.8 may allow attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via <insert attack vector here>

Published Updated Sources: NVD, Fortinet (CNA), CISA, FIRST EPSS, GitHub, GitHub Security Advisory

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.

Exploitation

Confirmed

CISA KEV, listed Jul 16, 2026

EPSS

91%

ahead of 99.8% of scored CVEs

Affects

Fortinet

10 products listed

CVSS base

9.8

critical · 2 sources

CISA SSVC assessment

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

CISA

Exploitation

Active

none · proof-of-concept · active

Automatable

Yes

can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps

Technical impact

Total

partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Remediation

The vendor's own words where we have them.

Upgrade to FortiSandbox version 4.4.9 or above Upgrade to FortiSandbox PaaS version 5.0.2 or above

CISA required action

Apply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.

Federal deadline Jul 19, 2026 — passed 35 days ago

First 24 hours

Ordered from the record's own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found.

  • Identify exposed assets running affected vendor/product/version combinations.
  • Treat as emergency remediation because CISA KEV status is present.
  • Search available logs for exploit probes, errors, authentication anomalies, or suspicious child processes matching the vulnerability class.

Affected scope

Vendor, product and version as the advisories word them.

VendorProductVersionsStatus
FortinetFortiSandbox4.4.0 to <= 4.4.8Vulnerable
FortinetFortiSandbox PaaS23.4.4374Vulnerable
FortinetFortiSandbox PaaS23.4.4350Vulnerable
FortinetFortiSandbox PaaS23.3.4329Vulnerable
FortinetFortiSandbox PaaS23.1.4245Vulnerable
FortinetFortiSandbox PaaS22.2.4151Vulnerable
FortinetFortiSandbox PaaS22.2.4134Vulnerable
FortinetFortiSandbox PaaS22.1.4113Vulnerable
FortinetFortiSandbox PaaS21.4.4072Vulnerable
FortinetFortiSandbox PaaS21.3.4055Vulnerable

Attack characteristics

The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.

Availability

High

Confidentiality

High

Integrity

High

Scope

Unchanged

Attack Complexity

Low

Attack Vector

Network

Privileges Req

None

User Interaction

None

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactSource
9.8CVSS 3.1critical3.95.9Fortinet (CNA), GHSA
9.1CVSS 3.1criticalFortinet (CNA)

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Weakness & attack patterns

  • CWE-78OS Command Injection

Inferred from the weakness class — not observed against this CVE.

CAPEC-242 · Code InjectionCAPEC-35 · Leverage Executable Code in Non-Executable Files

CISA KEV details

CISA lists a CVE here once it has evidence of exploitation against real targets.

Listed

Jul 16, 2026

Federal deadline

Jul 19, 2026

passed 35 days ago

Ransomware use

Unknown

CISA records ransomware use only for campaigns it has confirmed, so “Unknown” means unrecorded, not ruled out. The deadline binds US federal agencies; for everyone else it is a date to argue against.

Public exploit

Capability, not use: code existing is a different claim from anyone running it.

Repositories

13

1 of the 5 sampled are weaponized

Detection

Read off the CVSS vector and the weakness class. Starting points, not rules we have tested.

  • Prioritize edge telemetry for network-reachable FortiSandbox, FortiSandbox PaaS.
  • Monitor for scanner or exploit-pattern traffic after 13 public PoC repositories were reported.
web/proxy/WAF logsapplication logsnetwork IDS/IPSEDR process telemetryhost service logs

Timeline

What happened to this CVE, newest first — with the readings a source repeats on a schedule counted underneath rather than listed.

  1. 2026
  2. Added · CVSS 3.1 9.8 (AV:N)

    Jul 17, 2026 · NVD

  3. Added to CISA KEV catalog

    Jul 16, 2026 · CISA

  4. Initial · CVE published

    Apr 14, 2026 · NVD

  5. Added · GHSA-wfjv-vrx5-2cf2 published (critical)

    Apr 14, 2026 · GitHub Security Advisory

References

7 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record1

What should defenders know first?

CVE-2026-39808 is Fortinet FortiSandbox OS Command Injection Vulnerability, a critical vulnerability affecting FortiSandbox, FortiSandbox PaaS from Fortinet. The current evidence lists it in CISA KEV, and the exploit status is: Yes: CISA KEV signal present. Public exploit evidence is: 13 public PoC repositories reported; 1 marked weaponized in current dataset. The affected-version evidence is listed in the key facts and affected products tables. Defenders should first verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run those versions, then apply vendor patches or mitigations, restrict reachable attack surface, and preserve logs for detection review. CVSS 9.8 describes technical severity, while EPSS 91% helps estimate near-term exploit likelihood; neither replaces asset context. Unknown fields should remain explicit in tickets, and threat actor, IOC, victimology, or payload claims should not be added unless a cited source supports them. Monitor CISA KEV, vendor advisories, NVD changes, public PoC repositories, and internal telemetry for update triggers.