CVE Intelligence
Skip to main content
HIGH

CVE-2026-76715

CVE-2026-76715 — Unauthenticated Man-in-the-Middle Attach Leads to Remote Code Execution Vulnerability in HPE Networking Analytics and Location Engine (ALE)

A vulnerability in an administrative component of Analytics and Location Engine (ALE) is vulnerable to a man-in-the-middle (MitM) attack. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary code with root privileges on the affected appliance.

Published Updated Sources: cvelistV5, hpe

Triage

Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.

Exploitation

Unreported

no source claims exploitation

EPSS

0%

chance of exploitation in 30 days

Affects

HPE

ale

CVSS base

7.1

HIGH

CISA SSVC assessment

Three decision points CISA publishes for the CVEs it assesses · SSVC 2.0.3. A stakeholder decision, not a severity score.

CISA

Exploitation

None

none · proof-of-concept · active

Automatable

No

can an attacker script all four kill-chain steps

Technical impact

Total

partial · total control of the vulnerable component

Affected scope

The catalog records vendors and products as separate lists, not pairs, so which product belongs to which vendor is not something this page can say.

Vendors (1)

HPE

Products (1)

ale

Every base score collected

Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.

ScoreVersionSeverityExpl.ImpactSource
7.1CVSS 3.1HIGH——cvelistV5

Weakness & attack patterns

  • CWE-300

Attack patterns reported against this CVE. The ATT&CK techniques below are inferred from its weakness class.

  • T1040Network Sniffing
  • T1185Man in the Browser
  • T1557Adversary-in-the-Middle

References

1 on the record

Elsewhere on this site

  • HPEevery CVE for this vendor
  • CWE-300other pages naming this weakness

Not in any source we poll

Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.

  • No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
  • No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
  • No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.