CVE-2026-93685
CVE-2026-93685 — Multicluster-observability-addon: multicluster-observability-addon: possible unauthenticated debug/metrics endpoint via cmdfactory.newcontrollercommandconfig (confirmed exposed by engineering)
A flaw was found in the multicluster-observability-addon. A remote attacker can access a debug endpoint without authentication, due to a misconfiguration in the underlying addon-framework library. This allows for the disclosure of sensitive operational information, such as goroutine, heap, and command-line details, after completing a basic encrypted connection. This vulnerability does not enable direct remote code execution.
Published Updated Sources: NVD, Red Hat (CNA), GitHub, GitHub Security Advisory, Red Hat (VEX), SOCRadar CTI
Triage
Is it exploited, how likely is exploitation, what does it touch, and how severe do the scoring sources call it.
Exploitation
Unreported
no source claims exploitation
EPSS
0%
ahead of 0% of scored CVEs
CVSS base
5.4
medium
Remediation
The vendor's own words where we have them.
Upgrade Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2 to a fixed release. Apply vendor patches per advisory and restrict external exposure of the affected component until patched.
Red Hat VEX · CVE-2026-93685
workaround: To mitigate this issue, restrict network access to the pods running the `multicluster-observability-addon` to only trusted internal components. Implement network policies within y…
no_fix_planned: Out of support scope
none_available: Affected
First 24 hours
Ordered from the record's own fields — exposure first, because you cannot patch what you have not found.
- Identify exposed assets running affected vendor/product/version combinations.
- Prioritize based on EPSS, PoC availability, and external exposure.
- Search available logs for exploit probes, errors, authentication anomalies, or suspicious child processes matching the vulnerability class.
Affected scope
Vendor, product and version as the advisories word them.
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat | Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2 | — | Vulnerable |
| Red Hat | Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2 | — | Vulnerable |
Attack characteristics
The CVSS vector, decoded. It describes the attack, not your exposure to it.
Availability
Low
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Scope
Unchanged
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Vector
Adjacent
Privileges Req
None
User Interaction
None
Every base score collected
Sources score independently and disagree; each row says who scored it and under which version.
| Score | Version | Severity | Expl. | Impact | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.4 | CVSS 3.1 | medium | 2.8 | 2.5 | NVD, Red Hat (CNA), GHSA, Red Hat (VEX) |
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
What this weakness leads to
MITRE's own consequences and mitigations for the weakness class — the authority's wording, not guidance derived from the CVSS vector.
CWE-200 · Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
- Read Application Data::
Mitigation: Compartmentalize the system to have safe areas where trust boundaries can be unambiguously drawn. Do not allow sensitive data to go outside of the trust boundary and always be careful when interfacing with a compartment outside of the safe area. Ensure that appropriate compartmentalization is built into the system design, and the compartmentalization allows for and reinforces privilege separation functionality. Architects and designers should rely on the principle of least privilege to decide the appropriate time to use privileges and the time to drop privileges.::
Weakness & attack patterns
- CWE-200Exposure of Sensitive Information
Attack patterns reported against this CVE. The ATT&CK techniques below are inferred from its weakness class.
- T1562.003Impair Defenses: Impair Command History Logging
- T1574.006Hijack Execution Flow: Dynamic Linker Hijacking
- T1574.007Hijack Execution Flow: Path Interception by PATH Environment Variable
Timeline
What happened to this CVE, newest first — with the readings a source repeats on a schedule counted underneath rather than listed.
- 2026
Added · CVSS 3.1 5.4 (AV:A)
Sep 18, 2026 · NVD
Initial · CVE published
Sep 18, 2026 · NVD
Reported · Made public.
Sep 18, 2026 · Red Hat
Added · GHSA-v4vw-6qvh-vjwc published (medium)
Sep 18, 2026 · GitHub Security Advisory
CVE published by MITRE.
Sep 18, 2026 · SOCRadar CTI
Reported to Red Hat.
Jul 1, 2026 · Red Hat
References
5 on the record
- access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-93685
Vendor Advisory
- bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2518377
Vendor Advisory, Mitre
- nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-93685
NVD
- github.com/advisories/GHSA-v4vw-6qvh-vjwc
Exploit, Third Party Advisory
- www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-93685
Vendor Advisory
Elsewhere on this site
- Red Hatevery CVE for this vendor
- Info Disclosuresame class
- CWE-200other pages naming this weakness
Not in any source we poll
Listed rather than left blank: an empty field and an unmeasured one look identical on screen, and only one is a reason to look elsewhere.
- No confirmed IOCs, IP addresses, domains, file hashes, or malware artifacts supplied.
- No organization-specific asset inventory, compensating-control status, or patch deployment evidence supplied.
- No exploit packet captures, log samples, or incident case IDs supplied.
Answered from this record1
What should defenders know first?
CVE-2026-93685 is Multicluster-observability-addon: multicluster-observability-addon: possible unauthenticated debug/metrics endpoint via cmdfactory.newcontrollercommandconfig (confirmed exposed by engineering), a medium vulnerability affecting Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2 from Red Hat. The current evidence does not list it in CISA KEV, and the exploit status is: Active exploitation is not confirmed from current sources for CVE-2026-93685. Public exploit evidence is: A public PoC is not confirmed from current sources for CVE-2026-93685. The affected-version evidence is listed in the key facts and affected products tables. Defenders should first verify whether exposed or business-critical assets run those versions, then apply vendor patches or mitigations, restrict reachable attack surface, and preserve logs for detection review. CVSS 5.4 describes technical severity, while EPSS 0% helps estimate near-term exploit likelihood; neither replaces asset context. Unknown fields should remain explicit in tickets, and threat actor, IOC, victimology, or payload claims should not be added unless a cited source supports them. Monitor CISA KEV, vendor advisories, NVD changes, public PoC repositories, and internal telemetry for update triggers.