Welcome to SOCRadar’s Azerbaijan Threat Landscape Report 2026!

The Azerbaijan Threat Landscape Report 2026 delivers a comprehensive, data-driven analysis of the cyber threats targeting Azerbaijan, based on intelligence collected between September 2025 and September 2026. This report examines three critical areas: Dark Web threats, ransomware activity, and phishing campaigns. Unlike most regional threat profiles, Azerbaijan’s landscape is shaped by geopolitics and energy resources rather than by opportunistic cybercrime. Espionage and state-sponsored activity dominate the threat picture, while Public Administration and Oil and Gas absorb the majority of hostile attention. Inside, you will find industry and threat category distributions, profiles of the DeadLock, Crypto24, and APT73 ransomware groups, recent Dark Web activities targeting Azerbaijani entities, and the phishing tactics being used against the country, all with the actionable context your security teams need.

Download the full report today to gain strategic visibility into cyber risks affecting Azerbaijan and strengthen your organization’s defenses.

Key Insights from Azerbaijan’s Cyber Threat Landscape

• Public Administration (35.71%) and Oil and Gas (28.57%) together account for over 64% of all Dark Web threats against Azerbaijan, confirming that threat actors prioritize high-value, high-impact sectors over the broader economy.
• Espionage and state-sponsored activity makes up 55.22% of all Dark Web threat categories, an exceptionally high concentration that shows Azerbaijan faces strategic intelligence collection rather than conventional cybercrime.
• Data breach and compromise follows at 19.40%, indicating strong interest in acquiring and trading stolen data from Azerbaijani entities.
• Unauthorized access and credentials, phishing and social engineering, and vulnerability exploitation each hold 11.67% of threat types, forming the initial-access toolkit behind espionage and data breach campaigns.
• Malware and ransomware represents only 4.48% of Dark Web threat categories, and recorded ransomware incidents are split among three actors with no dominant group.
• DeadLock, Crypto24, and APT73 each hold roughly a 30% share of recorded ransomware activity, but underreporting in the region means the actual incident count is almost certainly higher than the data reflects.
• Finance and Insurance holds only 7.14% of Dark Web threats and does not appear in the ransomware data, making it a secondary target behind government and energy.
• 50% of phishing sites targeting Azerbaijan use HTTPS, proving the SSL padlock is no longer a reliable indicator of legitimacy.
• 72.22% of phishing pages have no page title, pointing to widespread use of automated phishing kits built for speed and volume, and TikTok is the top branded lure at 16.67%.
• Recent Dark Web activity includes exposed cPanel credentials of an Azerbaijani hosting provider, a database of one million Azerbaijani citizens listed for sale, an alleged zero-day exploit targeting an Azerbaijani retail chain, and a 11.8 GB data leak of approximately 1.95 million files from a logistics provider.
• The report profiles DeadLock’s distinctive techniques, including a Rust-based encryptor, geofencing that avoids CIS environments, BYOVD abuse of CVE-2024-51324 to kill endpoint detection at the kernel level, and EtherHiding negotiation infrastructure embedded in Polygon blockchain smart contracts.
• Crypto24 blends legitimate administrative tools with custom malware, using PsExec for lateral movement, AnyDesk for persistence, keyloggers for credential harvesting, Google Drive for exfiltration, and a custom RealBlindingEDR variant to disable endpoint security.

Why This Report Matters

Azerbaijan’s threat landscape is fundamentally different from most regional profiles. It is driven by geopolitical position and energy resources, not by profit-motivated cybercrime. With espionage and state-sponsored activity accounting for over 55% of categorized Dark Web threats and two sectors absorbing over 64% of all attention, organizations operating in or with Public Administration and Oil and Gas face a structured, multi-stage threat environment that conventional security planning does not fully address. Understanding who targets Azerbaijan, and why, is the foundation of an effective defense strategy.

The report also exposes critical visibility gaps. Recorded ransomware volume is low, but underreporting driven by reputational concerns means the real number is higher, and evaluating ransomware risk on public data alone will leave Azerbaijani entities unprepared. On the phishing front, the fact that half of phishing sites now use HTTPS and that automated kits dominate the landscape means legacy user awareness training built around the padlock symbol is actively misleading employees and needs immediate revision.

By combining Dark Web intelligence, ransomware group profiles, and phishing threat analysis into a single view, this report gives security teams, executives, and decision-makers the evidence base needed to prioritize investments, close detection gaps, and align defenses with the threats actually facing Azerbaijan.

Take Action Now

• Deploy Dark Web Monitoring to detect exposed credentials, citizen databases, exploit sales, and data leaks referencing Azerbaijani entities before they fuel espionage or breach campaigns.
• Use Ransomware Intelligence to track DeadLock, Crypto24, and APT73 tactics, including EtherHiding blockchain negotiation infrastructure and BYOVD kernel-level EDR tampering.
• Strengthen Phishing Detection & Response by retiring padlock-based trust assumptions, monitoring high-engagement consumer lures like TikTok, and deploying rapid takedown capabilities.
• Reinforce Access Security with strict credential hygiene, multi-factor authentication, and session controls to counter the unauthorized access and credential theft methods behind 11.67% of threat types.
• Prioritize Critical Sector Monitoring for Public Administration, Oil and Gas, and their supply chains, where over 64% of Dark Web threats are concentrated.
• Adopt Vulnerability & Exposure Management practices to close the exploited vulnerabilities and alleged zero-day channels that threat actors advertise as initial access routes.