External threat intelligence for CISOs and security leaders.
Quantify the risk outside your perimeter, evidence it to your board, and consolidate the tools you are already paying for, with AI you can actually govern.
This page is for you if
- You can report control coverage, but not a number for external risk.
- Your board or your insurer has started asking about exposure outside the perimeter.
- You are carrying four or five overlapping contracts you cannot defend line by line.
- Someone has asked how you govern the AI inside your security stack.
What changes at renewal, and in the board pack
External risk quantification is the continuous measurement of an organisation's exposure outside its perimeter, including credentials, impersonating infrastructure, unknown internet-facing assets and supplier incidents, expressed as a trended figure rather than a control-coverage percentage.
Contract classes covering external risk
“Three renewals became one. The part I did not expect was being able to show the board a trend line for external exposure rather than a maturity score.”
Chief Information Security Officer Insurance · $1B+ revenue · Gartner Peer Insights™ verified review
What you are dealing with, and what changes
Every row below is judged on the three questions you arrived with: can I consolidate, can I evidence this to the board, and will it survive procurement.
Controls coverage does not answer “are we secure”
AI Report Manager · Impact scoringContinuous external monitoring producing a quantified exposure position across credentials, impersonating infrastructure, exposed assets and supplier incidents, trended and exportable.
You present a number, a trend and a comparison instead of an assurance.
Regulators and insurers now ask about external risk specifically
Attack Surface Management · Supply Chain IntelligenceAutomated asset discovery including shadow IT, continuous supplier monitoring with control-level grading, and dark web collection mapped to your domains, brands, executives and IP ranges.
External risk becomes measured, evidenced and auditable rather than an acknowledged blind spot.
Five contracts, five renewal cycles, overlap you cannot defend to finance
Platform · Modular licensingOne platform covering threat intelligence, external attack surface and exposure management, digital risk and brand protection, third-party risk, identity intelligence, executive risk and takedown.
Fewer contracts, one renewal conversation, a defensible answer on each line item.
Disclosure windows are tightening and require knowing an incident happened
Dark Web Monitoring · Supply Chain IntelligenceEarly signal from underground monitoring, leak site tracking and supplier incident detection, ahead of public exposure.
Time to assess materiality, brief stakeholders and disclose on your terms.
Your board is asking how you govern AI inside the security stack
Agentic Threat IntelligenceAgentic decisions carry a step-by-step reasoning trail, are recorded in full audit logs, and adapt from your analysts' documented corrections rather than opaque vendor retraining.
An answer to the AI governance question that is a capability, not a policy document.
You don't need another dashboard
Findings arrive in the tools you already run. Marked ⇄ means bi-directional: status, severity and comments sync both ways, so closing it there closes it here.
Available through
Microsoft Sentinel ⇄ 
Microsoft Entra ID ⇄ 
ServiceNow ⇄ 
Splunk ⇄ 
Cortex XSOAR ⇄ 
Jira Service Management 
Google SecOps 
Elastic 
Slack One integration effort, not five. Marketplace availability means procurement can run through existing committed cloud spend rather than a new vendor onboarding cycle.
AI that decides, explains itself, and learns your environment
Decides
AI agents decide whether an alarm should exist at all: evaluating infrastructure, content and visual signals before anything reaches your queue.
Explains
Every decision carries a step-by-step reasoning trail with full audit logs, so “why did this fire” and “why didn't it” are both answerable.
Adapts
Your analysts correct verdicts and explain why. The model adapts to your organisation, so tuning compounds instead of resetting.
For a security leader the agentic story is a governance story: explainable, auditable, and tuned by your own team. That is a different conversation from “our AI is smart”.
Explore Agentic Threat IntelligenceWhat consolidation actually looks like
The categories a single platform covers, and the point-tool classes each one displaces:
External attack surface discovery and validated continuous assessment, the CTEM category, displacing standalone scanner and EASM contracts.
Continuous supplier posture with control-level grading and framework mapping, displacing annual questionnaire platforms.
Credential exposure intelligence, brand protection, takedown and executive risk in one contract.
Reference view, not live data. Compliance framework coverage and the plans and pricing page show how the modules are licensed separately, so consolidation can be staged rather than done in one move.
External risk position, trended against last quarter
ImprovingWhat our customers say.
50,000+ world-class brands and organizations across 150+ countries.
Questions we get in this role
How do CISOs quantify risk outside the perimeter?
By measuring it continuously rather than assessing it periodically: exposed credentials, impersonating infrastructure, unknown internet-facing assets, and supplier incidents, each trended over time and exportable. The output is a figure and a direction of travel, which is what a risk committee can act on.
How many security tools can a threat intelligence platform replace?
In practice the overlap is with four to six contract classes: standalone threat intelligence feeds, external attack surface or exposure management, digital risk and brand protection, third-party risk questionnaire platforms, identity or credential exposure monitoring, and takedown services.
How is agentic AI in security tooling governed and audited?
Each agentic decision produces a step-by-step reasoning trail showing which signals were evaluated and how, recorded in audit logs available for review. Analyst corrections are documented and adapt the model for your organisation, so tuning is traceable rather than opaque.
Does this satisfy regulatory third-party obligations?
Supplier findings are mapped to controls across major frameworks including GDPR, DORA, ISO 27001, PCI DSS and NIST CSF, with audit-grade evidence views and PDF and Excel export, designed for the continuous-oversight expectation those regimes introduced.
What consolidation does not mean
Replacing five contracts with one creates its own risk, and the honest version of this conversation says so. Four boundaries we hold to.
You do not have to buy it all at once
Modules are licensed separately. Most programmes start with the one contract closest to renewal and stage the rest, so consolidation is a sequence rather than a single irreversible decision.
It does not replace your scanner or your SIEM
The platform sits over them: prioritisation on top of scanner output, findings delivered into the SIEM you already run. Internal authority stays where it is.
Your data does not become hostage to the platform
Findings export in PDF and Excel, intelligence serves through TAXII 2.1 in STIX 2.1, and APIs cover platform capability, so what you accumulate stays portable.
Agentic decisions are reviewable, not taken on trust
Every verdict carries its reasoning trail and sits in an audit log. That is what makes the AI governance answer a capability you can show rather than a policy you can quote.
See SOCRadar in action.
A walkthrough run against your own organisation: your domains, your brands, your suppliers. Not a canned dataset.
- Your live exposure position: the number and the trend you would actually take to a risk committee.
- The consolidation map: which of your current contract classes this covers, and which it does not.
- Board-ready output: the exported report, with the underlying findings attached.
- AI governance in practice: an agentic verdict opened up, reasoning trail and audit log included.
Additional Resources
Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Cyberthreat Intelligence Technologies
SOCRadar is named a Visionary. Read the placement and what it reflects about platform direction.
Read the recognitionSOCRadar Threat Research Unit
Original investigations from our threat research team, coordinated with national CERT and CSIRT teams: the collection capability behind the platform, demonstrated in public.
Read the latest researchExternal Threat Assessment Report
A domain-scoped external risk profile covering dark web exposure, leaked credentials, phishing infrastructure and public cloud exposure. Ready to take to a leadership meeting.
Generate a report