Threat intelligence and IOC enrichment for SOC analysts.
Context where the alert is, not in another tab.
This page is for you if
- You have six tabs open for one alert and none of them share context.
- You spend twenty minutes ruling out a plausible false positive and have nothing to attach.
- A suspicious attachment arrives and there is nowhere safe to open it.
- Your tooling stops at a verdict, so the investigation stops there too.
What changes on a real alert
Indicator enrichment is the automatic addition of reputation, attribution, campaign association and prior-sighting context to an indicator of compromise, so a raw address or hash becomes evidence you can triage on.
Tools open to triage one alert
“The browser extension removed about ten minutes from every phishing ticket. That is most of my shift back over a week.”
Security Analyst Technology · 1,000-5,000 employees · Gartner Peer Insights™ verified review
What you are dealing with, and what changes
Written for the person doing the triage rather than the person signing the contract. Every row is something you can check in a trial on your own alerts.
Six tabs per alert, none sharing context
Integrations · Browser extensionEnrichment delivered into the SIEM, SOAR or case tool, so reputation, attribution and history arrive with the alert.
The lookup step disappears from the investigation.
An address is not information until it carries attribution and history
Indicator enrichmentAutomatic enrichment with reputation, actor association, campaign linkage and prior sightings, scored for relevance to your organisation.
You triage on evidence rather than instinct.
Twenty minutes to rule out a plausible false positive, with nothing to show
Impact scoringRelevance scoring weighted to your organisation's assets, sector and exposure, visible before the investigation starts.
Fewer plausible-looking dead ends.
A suspicious attachment with nowhere safe to open it
Malware AnalysisStatic analysis in seconds without execution, dynamic behavioural analysis with indicator extraction, and interactive sessions where you drive the sandbox yourself with playback, including email files and URLs.
Phishing triage completed in one place, with evidence to attach to the ticket.
Tooling stops at a verdict, so investigations do too
Threat InvestigationPivoting from indicator to infrastructure to actor to campaign, and back into your environment through integration.
Investigations reach conclusions, not just verdicts.
You don't need another dashboard
Findings arrive in the tools you already run. Marked ⇄ means bi-directional: status, severity and comments sync both ways, so closing it there closes it here.
Available through
Microsoft Sentinel ⇄ 
Splunk ⇄ 
Cortex XSOAR ⇄ 
ServiceNow ⇄ 
Jira ⇄ 
Slack ⇄ 
Google SecOps 
Elastic 
Microsoft Teams The browser extension is the fastest thing to try: enrich, save and analyse indicators on any page, whether that is webmail, a ticket or a vendor advisory, and export in STIX 2.1.
AI that decides, explains itself, and learns your environment
Decides
AI agents decide whether an alarm should exist at all: evaluating infrastructure, content and visual signals before anything reaches your queue.
Explains
Every decision carries a step-by-step reasoning trail with full audit logs, so “why did this fire” and “why didn't it” are both answerable.
Adapts
Your analysts correct verdicts and explain why. The model adapts to your organisation, so tuning compounds instead of resetting.
One thing worth knowing: when you mark a verdict wrong and say why, that correction is kept and improves future decisions for your organisation. Your feedback changes the product.
Explore Agentic Threat IntelligenceWhat you get on a real alert
Three things that change the shape of a triage:
Verdict plus a relevance score weighted to your organisation, so you know whether it matters to you before you start.
Actor association, campaign linkage and prior sightings, with the source observations reachable.
For credential findings, a virtual view of the infected machine covering processes, files and cookies, and the infection path mapped to MITRE ATT&CK.
Reference view, not live data. IOC Radar and the SOC Incident Toolkit run the same lookups without an account, which is the quickest way to try this on an indicator you are working right now.
185.x.x.x flagged in an outbound connection alert
RelevantWhat our customers say.
50,000+ world-class brands and organizations across 150+ countries.
Questions we get in this role
How do you enrich an indicator during triage?
Submit an address, domain, URL or hash and get reputation, actor association, campaign linkage, prior sightings and a relevance score for your organisation. Enrichment is also delivered automatically into the SIEM or case tool with the alert, and can be run in-page through the browser extension.
How do you analyse a suspicious email attachment safely?
Static analysis returns a verdict in seconds without executing the file. Dynamic analysis runs it in a sandbox and returns behaviour, extracted indicators and MITRE mappings. Interactive sessions let you drive the environment yourself with playback. Email files and URLs are supported directly.
How do you tell a false positive from a real detection quickly?
Relevance scoring is weighted to your organisation's assets, sector and exposure, so it is visible before you start whether an indicator has any bearing on you. Prior sightings and campaign association then either support or eliminate the hypothesis without a manual hunt.
What context is available on leaked credentials?
Credential findings include the malware family responsible, a virtual view of the infected machine covering processes, files and cookies, the infection path mapped to MITRE ATT&CK, and password strength assessment, which is enough to determine scope without waiting for endpoint forensics.
What this does not ask of you
Tooling that adds a step gets turned off, whatever it promises. Four things this does not do.
It does not ask you to work somewhere else
Enrichment arrives in the SIEM, SOAR or case tool you already have open. The browser extension works on whatever page you are already reading. There is no console you are required to live in.
It does not hide the verdict behind a score
Reputation, attribution, campaign linkage and prior sightings are all shown, and the source observation behind each one is reachable. You can disagree with the verdict on evidence.
It does not make your correction disappear
Mark a verdict wrong, say why, and that correction is kept and adapts the model for your organisation. It does not vanish into a vendor feedback form.
It does not decide what you escalate
Relevance scoring orders the queue. Whether something becomes an incident is still an analyst call, and the evidence to justify it is attached to the ticket.
See SOCRadar in action.
A walkthrough run on your own alerts: your indicators, your mail flow, your case tool. Not a canned dataset.
- An indicator you are working right now: enriched live, with the source observation opened.
- A real attachment: static verdict in seconds, then dynamic and interactive analysis with playback.
- In your queue, not ours: the same enrichment arriving attached to an alert in your SIEM.
- The browser extension: installed and used in-page during the call, in under a minute.
Additional Resources
SOC Incident Toolkit
Investigation tooling for phishing, malware and account breach, with indicator lookup and campaign context. Free, no account.
Open the toolkitSOCRadar Threat Research Unit
Original investigations from our threat research team, with indicators and hunting context you can use directly in an investigation.
Read the latest researchSOCRadar University
Free courses on threat intelligence, investigation workflow and generative AI tooling for analysts.
Start learning